Summary
Add a small scanner fixture that demonstrates a candidate browser/computer-use submit action.
Actenon’s scanner should help identify places where an AI agent, browser agent, or computer-use workflow may be able to submit a form, update settings, upload data, confirm a purchase, or trigger another consequential browser-side effect.
Why this matters
Browser agents are one of the clearest execution-gap surfaces. An agent can appear to be “just navigating” while actually submitting a real-world action.
A fixture makes this easier to test, document, and explain.
Suggested scope
Add a small intentionally unsafe example fixture under an appropriate test/examples location, such as:
- browser form submit
- settings update
- export CSV
- account deletion confirmation
- purchase confirmation
The fixture should be synthetic and safe. It must not contact any external service.
Acceptance criteria
- A new scanner fixture exists for a browser submit-style action.
- The scanner identifies it as a candidate consequential action path.
- The output remains advisory and uses consequence-class language.
- Tests are added or updated.
- No vulnerability claim is made.
Summary
Add a small scanner fixture that demonstrates a candidate browser/computer-use submit action.
Actenon’s scanner should help identify places where an AI agent, browser agent, or computer-use workflow may be able to submit a form, update settings, upload data, confirm a purchase, or trigger another consequential browser-side effect.
Why this matters
Browser agents are one of the clearest execution-gap surfaces. An agent can appear to be “just navigating” while actually submitting a real-world action.
A fixture makes this easier to test, document, and explain.
Suggested scope
Add a small intentionally unsafe example fixture under an appropriate test/examples location, such as:
The fixture should be synthetic and safe. It must not contact any external service.
Acceptance criteria