Skip to content

Commit fb4be8f

Browse files
authored
bug fix for building height in urban lcz parameter table (wrf-model#1867)
Bug fix for building height in LCZ urban parameter table TYPE: bug fix KEYWORDS: urban, BEP, BEP_BEM, parameter table, building height SOURCE: Cenlin He (NCAR), Alberto Martilli (CIEMAT, Spain) DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: Problem: The BEP and BEP_BEM urban schemes (urban_physics = 2,3) require the building height distribution to be a multiple of 5-m because of the hard-coded dz_u = 5 parameter in BEP and BEP_BEM source code. However, currently the urban parameter table (URBPARM_LCZ.TBL) has a building height distribution as a multiple of 3-m, which will cause model issues. Solution: Change the building height distribution in URBPARM_LCZ.TBL to be a multiple of 5-m. In addition to the model code requirement as mentioned above, the justifications of this change also include: (1) the NUDAPT database has building heights as a multiple of 5m. (2) the updated mean building heights in URBPARM_LCZ.TBL aer equal to the middle range values of the urban LCZs from Stewart and Oke (2012): Stewart, I. D., & Oke, T. R. (2012). Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), 1879-1900. LIST OF MODIFIED FILES: run/URBPARM_LCZ.TBL TESTS CONDUCTED: The regression tests have passed. The mods fixed the problem. RELEASE NOTE: This is a bug fix for building height in LCZ urban parameter table.
1 parent 3d75d94 commit fb4be8f

File tree

1 file changed

+27
-29
lines changed

1 file changed

+27
-29
lines changed

run/URBPARM_LCZ.TBL

+27-29
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -543,105 +543,103 @@ BUILDING HEIGHTS: 1
543543

544544
# height Percentage
545545
# [m] [%]
546-
21.0 100.0
546+
40.0 17.
547+
45.0 21.
548+
50.0 24.
549+
55.0 21.
550+
60.0 17.
547551
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
548552

549553
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 2
550554
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
551555

552556
# height Percentage
553557
# [m] [%]
554-
9.0 25.0
555-
15.0 45.0
556-
18.0 20.0
557-
21.0 10.0
558+
15.0 50.
559+
20.0 50.
558560
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
559561

560562
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 3
561563
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
562564

563565
# height Percentage
564566
# [m] [%]
565-
6.0 55.0
566-
9.0 45.0
567+
5.0 72.
568+
10.0 28.
567569
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
568570

569571
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 4
570572
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
571573

572574
# height Percentage
573575
# [m] [%]
574-
24.0 100.0
576+
40.0 17.
577+
45.0 21.
578+
50.0 24.
579+
55.0 21.
580+
60.0 17.
575581
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
576582

577583
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 5
578584
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
579585

580586
# height Percentage
581587
# [m] [%]
582-
9.0 10.0
583-
15.0 25.0
584-
21.0 40.0
585-
24.0 25.0
588+
15.0 50.
589+
20.0 50.
586590
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
587591

588592
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 6
589593
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
590594

591595
# height Percentage
592596
# [m] [%]
593-
6.0 30.0
594-
9.0 40.0
595-
15.0 30.0
597+
5.0 72.
598+
10.0 28.
596599
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
597600

598601
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 7
599602
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
600603

601604
# height Percentage
602605
# [m] [%]
603-
5.0 100.0
604-
9.0 0.0
605-
15.0 0.0
606-
21.0 0.0
607-
24.0 0.0
606+
5.0 100.
608607
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
609608

610609
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 8
611610
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
612611

613612
# height Percentage
614613
# [m] [%]
615-
6.0 35.0
616-
9.0 65.0
614+
5.0 72.
615+
10.0 28.
617616
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
618617

619618
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 9
620619
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
621620

622621
# height Percentage
623622
# [m] [%]
624-
6.0 75.0
625-
9.0 25.0
623+
5.0 72.
624+
10.0 28.
626625
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
627626

628627
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 10
629628
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
630629

631630
# height Percentage
632631
# [m] [%]
633-
3.0 10.0
634-
9.0 60.0
635-
15.0 30.0
632+
5.0 16.
633+
10.0 68.
634+
15.0 16.
636635
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
637636

638637
BUILDING HEIGHTS: 11
639638
# (sf_urban_physics=2,3)
640639

641640
# height Percentage
642641
# [m] [%]
643-
6.0 100.0
644-
642+
5.0 100.0
645643
END BUILDING HEIGHTS
646644

647645

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)