You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we test against the result of the final extpar-file after the consistency_check.f90.
This takes a lot of time and many configurations are tested multiple times.
Switchting to a more fine grained testing approach based on the intermediate buffer files would it make much easier to
test more configurations.
Furthermore one could parallelize testing even more and submit each integration test for a buffer exe individually.
Also one could test much easier different namelist combinations for the same script, because execution time would be in the order of seconds, not teens of minutes.
Also one could consider moving to pytest entirely, since it offers more flexibility with regard to test design.
The testsuite currently involves quite some bash-scripting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we test against the result of the final extpar-file after the
consistency_check.f90
.This takes a lot of time and many configurations are tested multiple times.
Switchting to a more fine grained testing approach based on the intermediate buffer files would it make much easier to
test more configurations.
Furthermore one could parallelize testing even more and submit each integration test for a buffer exe individually.
Also one could test much easier different namelist combinations for the same script, because execution time would be in the order of seconds, not teens of minutes.
Also one could consider moving to pytest entirely, since it offers more flexibility with regard to test design.
The testsuite currently involves quite some bash-scripting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: