Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 instead of modernc for trivy #34363

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor

@paulcacheux paulcacheux commented Feb 24, 2025

What does this PR do?

Similar to #34358 but for the trivy use case.

Reasons for the Change:

  • Alignment with Podman collector: related to the PR linked above.
  • Reduction in binary size ([podman] Change sqlite backend #34358 (comment)): the trivy import was the last one for modernc.org/sqlite so this PR removes the dependency fully.

The part of the code that uses this is not highly performance-sensitive, as it only executes a simple query to retrieve the list of packages on some red hat based distributions.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

This was tested manually on some redhat based distribution.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time team/agent-security labels Feb 24, 2025
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: e3f7cad
Comparison: 14b372e

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+0, -8
-github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft
-modernc.org/libc
-modernc.org/libc/sys/types
-modernc.org/libc/uuid/uuid
-modernc.org/mathutil
-modernc.org/memory
-modernc.org/sqlite
-modernc.org/sqlite/lib
agentlinuxarm64
+0, -8
-github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft
-modernc.org/libc
-modernc.org/libc/sys/types
-modernc.org/libc/uuid/uuid
-modernc.org/mathutil
-modernc.org/memory
-modernc.org/sqlite
-modernc.org/sqlite/lib
system-probelinuxamd64
+1, -8
+github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
-github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft
-modernc.org/libc
-modernc.org/libc/sys/types
-modernc.org/libc/uuid/uuid
-modernc.org/mathutil
-modernc.org/memory
-modernc.org/sqlite
-modernc.org/sqlite/lib
system-probelinuxarm64
+1, -8
+github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
-github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft
-modernc.org/libc
-modernc.org/libc/sys/types
-modernc.org/libc/uuid/uuid
-modernc.org/mathutil
-modernc.org/memory
-modernc.org/sqlite
-modernc.org/sqlite/lib

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor e3f7cade9bcec8d5cf32910b6ed8856eb0b68156

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.50MB 39.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.50MB 39.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.96MB 37.96MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.02MB 62.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.09MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.09MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.26MB 59.26MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.33MB 59.33MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb -0.00MB 443.27MB 443.28MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -5.00MB 825.16MB 830.17MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -5.01MB 834.91MB 839.92MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -5.47MB 844.36MB 849.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -5.47MB 844.36MB 849.83MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -5.48MB 834.59MB 840.06MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=56786938 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 14b372e

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 807.63MiB 847.49MiB 194.97MiB 212.33MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 798.56MiB 836.66MiB 177.16MiB 192.5MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 807.71MiB 847.82MiB 198.01MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 798.66MiB 836.66MiB 178.31MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 807.69MiB 847.82MiB 198.01MiB 215.76MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 798.56MiB 836.66MiB 178.31MiB 194.24MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.78MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.27MiB 48.1MiB 8.49MiB 19.1MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.79MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.79MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.89MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.59MiB 66.4MiB 12.82MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.59MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.22MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 892.05MiB 931.7MiB 298.42MiB 318.67MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 906.32MiB 944.08MiB 284.17MiB 303.0MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.06GiB 1.1GiB 373.51MiB 393.75MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.07GiB 1.1GiB 355.25MiB 373.71MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.81MiB 57.88MiB 17.28MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.45MiB 56.27MiB 16.16MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.94MiB 274.78MiB 106.33MiB 116.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.9MiB 290.82MiB 101.19MiB 111.12MiB

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 8a3a962e-9fab-4cea-a3ed-d410ad0c81ee

Baseline: e3f7cad
Comparison: 14b372e
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.74, +0.74] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.28, +0.28] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.63, +0.63] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.63, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.79, +0.77] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.79, +0.77] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.83, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.08 [-0.55, +0.38] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.26 [-1.13, +0.61] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.32 [-3.23, +2.60] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.47 [-1.24, +0.31] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.50 [-0.53, -0.46] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.56 [-0.61, -0.50] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization -0.63 [-0.70, -0.56] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -1.31 [-1.39, -1.23] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@paulcacheux paulcacheux force-pushed the paulcacheux/sqlite-backend-trivy branch from a222f9e to 14b372e Compare February 24, 2025 18:11
@paulcacheux paulcacheux added qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests changelog/no-changelog labels Feb 24, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 10:23
@paulcacheux paulcacheux requested review from a team as code owners February 25, 2025 10:23
@paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-02-25 10:40:23 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-02-25 10:40:30 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-02-25 10:58:10 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 28m.


2025-02-25 11:30:32 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 565c054 into main Feb 25, 2025
272 of 275 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the paulcacheux/sqlite-backend-trivy branch February 25, 2025 11:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.65.0 milestone Feb 25, 2025
paulcacheux added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants