Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump go-sqllexer to v0.1.1 #34433

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

lu-zhengda
Copy link
Contributor

@lu-zhengda lu-zhengda commented Feb 25, 2025

What does this PR do?

This PR bumps go-sqllexer to v0.1.1. Prior bump caused increased cpu and memory usage due to a bug causes infinite loop in tokenization. v0.1.1 fixes the bug.

Tested in staging, memory remains stable
image

Motivation

The go-sqllexer package bump was intended to bring better cpu and memory performance to SQL obfuscation and normalization. The previous bump to v0.1.0 caused regressions (#incident-35445) due to an infinite loop bug in tokenization. v0.1.1 addresses the bug.

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Feb 25, 2025
@lu-zhengda lu-zhengda added team/database-monitoring backport/7.64.x Automatically create a backport PR to 7.64.x qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Feb 25, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor bd66ea57f7e49512ecd63cc74cd7ab8ffda08063

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.12MB ⚠️ 849.94MB 849.82MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.12MB ⚠️ 849.94MB 849.82MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.11MB ⚠️ 840.02MB 839.91MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.10MB ⚠️ 840.15MB 840.05MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.08MB ⚠️ 443.36MB 443.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.08MB ⚠️ 830.24MB 830.16MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 62.10MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 62.10MB 62.09MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 59.34MB 59.33MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 62.03MB 62.02MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 59.27MB 59.26MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.50MB 39.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.50MB 39.50MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.96MB 37.96MB 0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 812.93MiB 841.59MiB 196.86MiB 210.72MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 803.54MiB 830.66MiB 175.5MiB 192.1MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 813.07MiB 841.52MiB 199.36MiB 214.52MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 803.54MiB 830.66MiB 180.88MiB 193.64MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 812.93MiB 841.52MiB 199.36MiB 214.52MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 803.52MiB 830.66MiB 180.88MiB 194.03MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.78MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.27MiB 48.1MiB 8.49MiB 19.1MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.79MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.67MiB 49.7MiB 9.79MiB 20.6MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.88MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.6MiB 66.4MiB 12.84MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.6MiB 66.4MiB 12.85MiB 22.8MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.23MiB 69.0MiB 14.9MiB 24.8MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 897.38MiB 926.0MiB 300.94MiB 317.43MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 911.19MiB 939.07MiB 286.44MiB 302.43MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.07GiB 1.1GiB 376.05MiB 392.54MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.07GiB 1.1GiB 357.52MiB 373.21MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.81MiB 57.88MiB 17.28MiB 28.29MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.45MiB 56.27MiB 16.16MiB 27.06MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.95MiB 274.78MiB 106.35MiB 116.28MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.92MiB 290.82MiB 101.18MiB 111.12MiB

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: b8bfd15d-e817-41f3-af85-048768a2f642

Baseline: bd66ea5
Comparison: c7e5618
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +0.37 [+0.32, +0.42] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.27 [+0.22, +0.32] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.26 [-0.21, +0.73] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.19 [-0.73, +1.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.75, +0.79] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.71, +0.72] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.02] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.30, +0.31] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.70, +0.70] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.85, +0.85] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.64, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.78, +0.76] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.82, +0.75] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.15 [-0.19, -0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.17 [-0.22, -0.11] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -3.31 [-6.15, -0.48] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@lu-zhengda lu-zhengda marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 17:03
@lu-zhengda lu-zhengda requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2025 17:03
@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman self-assigned this Feb 25, 2025
@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman removed their assignment Feb 25, 2025
@lu-zhengda
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 25, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-02-25 21:44:02 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-02-25 21:44:07 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 29m.


2025-02-25 22:24:19 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit affd2a9 into main Feb 25, 2025
281 of 285 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the zhengda.lu/sqllexer-inf-loop-fix branch February 25, 2025 22:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.65.0 milestone Feb 25, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 7.64.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-7.64.x 7.64.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-7.64.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-34433-to-7.64.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 affd2a9911516e4e5c0ee6d65487108241bfa02e
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-34433-to-7.64.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-7.64.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 7.64.x and the compare/head branch is backport-34433-to-7.64.x.

lu-zhengda added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
(cherry picked from commit affd2a9)
lu-zhengda added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
(cherry picked from commit affd2a9)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/7.64.x Automatically create a backport PR to 7.64.x long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/database-monitoring
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants