Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(libdatadog): upgrade to v16.0.3 #12529

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mabdinur
Copy link
Contributor

@mabdinur mabdinur commented Feb 26, 2025

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

@mabdinur mabdinur requested review from a team as code owners February 26, 2025 17:44
@mabdinur mabdinur enabled auto-merge (squash) February 26, 2025 17:44
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 26, 2025

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/upgrade-libdatadog-v16-0-3-c47ce9b03c69cb63.yaml     @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/cmake/FindLibdatadog.cmake           @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/sample.cpp            @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/profiling/collector/_memalloc_reentrant.h                       @DataDog/profiling-python
src/native/Cargo.lock                                                   @DataDog/apm-core-python
src/native/Cargo.toml                                                   @DataDog/apm-core-python

@mabdinur mabdinur force-pushed the munir/bump-lib-datadog branch from d1d287c to 5c9872a Compare February 26, 2025 18:08
@mabdinur mabdinur requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2025 18:08
@mabdinur mabdinur requested a review from juanjux February 26, 2025 18:08
@mabdinur mabdinur requested a review from BaptisteFoy February 26, 2025 18:29
@mabdinur mabdinur force-pushed the munir/bump-lib-datadog branch from 365c8db to 44b3fcd Compare February 26, 2025 19:36
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: munir/bump-lib-datadog
Commit report: 8021ece
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 43 Passed, 290 Skipped, 48.31s Total duration (5m 25.16s time saved)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-02-26 20:45:31

Comparing candidate commit 8021ece in PR branch munir/bump-lib-datadog with baseline commit 2aa4ffb in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 418 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

@mabdinur mabdinur requested a review from sanchda February 26, 2025 22:38
Copy link
Contributor

@BaptisteFoy BaptisteFoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants