Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation character assassination #1279

Open
DavidT3 opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Documentation character assassination #1279

DavidT3 opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation refinement If a feature has already been implemented, and works, but could do with another pass to improve it. review Review and analyse how well a feature works

Comments

@DavidT3
Copy link
Owner

DavidT3 commented Nov 25, 2024

First step to improving the documentation is going to be to just read through all of it, and be really critical of what is in it, how it is laid out, and how I presented things.

This is not an incredibly urgent project, so we can do this piecemeal over time - I think maybe a separate notes project entry for each section will be the way to go, so everyone can collate their notes about a particular bit in one place.

The two main things we want to achieve with this (I think, please everyone say if they think there is something else critical we need to improve about the docs) is that the way I wrote the tutorials (for instance) focuses too much on the details of how things are working, which most users don't want or need to know; and the other thing is that the generalised tutorials should be supplemented by very targeted 'case studies' like we have in DAXA docs (these would help someone achieve a specific scientific goal, like say measuring R500s for a sample of clusters).

@DavidT3 DavidT3 converted this from a draft issue Nov 25, 2024
@DavidT3 DavidT3 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation refinement If a feature has already been implemented, and works, but could do with another pass to improve it. review Review and analyse how well a feature works labels Nov 25, 2024
@DavidT3
Copy link
Owner Author

DavidT3 commented Nov 25, 2024

@jessicapilling Did some work to convert the documentation to multi-mission (see here for a non-public docs build for the integrate multi-mission branch ), so I suggest reviewing that one, or waiting until multi-mission is in the main branch.

@rz-wang You'll be very helpful in this endeavour because you've not really used XGA, so will be able to give us a relatively fresh perspective. Also, hopefully this will help you understand what makes good documentation, which you'll need to write for your Chandra features.

@DavidT3 DavidT3 moved this from Backlog to In progress in Revamping XGA documentation Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation refinement If a feature has already been implemented, and works, but could do with another pass to improve it. review Review and analyse how well a feature works
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants