Skip to content

Questions about the most relevant neurons #11

@JiachengXu123

Description

@JiachengXu123

Hello, thanks for your excellent work.
I'm trying to reproduce the experiments. After reading through the source codes, I have two questions.
First, why does "np.argsort(totalR[subject_layer])[0][::-1][:num_rel]" refer to the most relevant neurons? When I set the num_rel to be 6, it seems that the output of "np.argsort(totalR[subject_layer])[0][::-1]" equals to the output of "np.argsort(totalR[subject_layer])[0][::-1][:num_rel]". The subject layers in this function is 3. The shape of "np.argsort(totalR[subject_layer])[0][::-1][:num_rel]" is (4, 4, 12).
Second, when calculating the IDC coverage, I got an error. The command ">python run.py -M lenet1 -DS mnist -L 1 -A idc -KS 10000 -KN 3 -RN 6 -C 0" is leveraged as input.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "run.py", line 206, in
coverage, covered_combinations, max_comb = idc.test(X_test)
File "E:\githubAwesomeCode\1DLTesting\sadl_improve\coverages\idc.py", line 106, in test
coverage, covered_combinations, max_comb = measure_idc(self.model, self.model_name,
File "E:\githubAwesomeCode\1DLTesting\sadl_improve\coverages\idc.py", line 265, in measure_idc
lout.append(np.mean(test_layer_outs[subject_layer][test_idx][...,r]))
IndexError: index 8 is out of bounds for axis 2 with size 4.

Thank you very much for your kind consideration and I am looking forward to your early reply.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions