Skip to content

Corruption of const input string that use C.O.W. #31

@GoogleCodeExporter

Description

@GoogleCodeExporter
GCC-4.6 seems to use C.O.W. (Copy-On-Write) for std::strings.
When calling std::string modp::b85_decode(const std::string& s), the input 
string s is corrupted.
This is due to the fact that although 's' is "copied" into an internal copy 
'x', the copy is not really done. A further call to the non-const b85_decode() 
corrupts s, since it uses const_cast to strip the const from the .data() 
returned results (presumably to avoid a copy at all costs on all 
implementations).

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. On gcc (with C.O.W.), pass an std::string 's' to modp::b85_decode(const 
std::string& s);
2. 's' is now corrupted.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
A call to a function that accepts const should not alter the const argument.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
gcc 4.6 on Linux.

Please provide any additional information below.

One possible fix is to change the implementation to:
     inline std::string b85_decode(const std::string& s)
     {
         // std::string x(s); // original impl.
         std::string x(s.data(), s.size()); // new impl. - force copy even with COW
         b85_decode(x);
         return x;
     }

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 1 Nov 2012 at 8:37

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions