The test accuracy is pretty low (53.5%) for citeseer dataset

[erichanxin]

I switched the dataset to citeseer, and trained for 100 epochs, the 99th epoch training log is:
Epoch: 0099 loss_train: 0.9922 acc_train: 0.7000 loss_val: 1.0769 acc_val: 0.7100 time: 38.2587s

However, the finial test result is:
Test set results: loss= 1.2956 accuracy= 0.5350

The accuracy is pretty low, not like the 72% shown in the paper

[SuperBruceJia]

I switched the dataset to citeseer, and trained for 100 epochs, the 99th epoch training log is:
Epoch: 0099 loss_train: 0.9922 acc_train: 0.7000 loss_val: 1.0769 acc_val: 0.7100 time: 38.2587s

However, the finial test result is:
Test set results: loss= 1.2956 accuracy= 0.5350

The accuracy is pretty low, not like the 72% shown in the paper

Have you solved the problem?

[MichailChatzianastasis]

Is there any update on this issue? I also obtain low performance on citeseer.

[erichanxin]

Actually NO! I cannot find any method to solve this problem.

[LQchen1]

Based on your epoch log, it looks like the model is overfitting, maybe try changing the dropout parameter