We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Common Trig Functions
As reported in #543 (comment): Julia 1.11 - core - ubuntu-20.04 - x64 - packaged libReactant - assertions=false
fn = tanpi: Test Failed at /home/runner/work/Reactant.jl/Reactant.jl/test/basic.jl:1012 Expression: #= /home/runner/work/Reactant.jl/Reactant.jl/test/basic.jl:1012 =# @jit(fn.(x_ra)) ≈ fn.(x) Evaluated: ConcreteRArray{Float32, 2}(Float32[-0.21030955 6.786836 … 25.12034 -14.385436; -0.19476584 1.6611387 … -0.19030015 14.128226; -19.919302 4.171895 … 0.16302171 2.0547147; 0.40969867 0.09946294 … 1.0452943 1.3147937]) ≈ Float32[-0.21030961 6.7868366 … 25.120296 -14.385441; -0.19476582 1.6611385 … -0.19030032 14.128206; -19.919342 4.1718936 … 0.16302171 2.0547144; 0.40969867 0.099462934 … 1.0452943 1.3147937]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I may be wrong, but I haven't seen error for a few days 🤔
Sorry, something went wrong.
Nevermind: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Reactant.jl/actions/runs/13143104178/job/36674740411#step:9:510
I feel like we should not use rand as the way to resolve
No branches or pull requests
As reported in #543 (comment): Julia 1.11 - core - ubuntu-20.04 - x64 - packaged libReactant - assertions=false
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: