Replies: 7 comments
-
|
For me:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My options:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
All timeslots work for me, but would prefer a 16:00-17:00 timeslot |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@nklomp do you have enough responses to schedule the meetings? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
Given time is passing by really quickly and since we want to have a DIIPv5 early next year, I suggest to have a weekly cadence of a 1 hour meeting to discuss the topics and work needed for DIIPv5.
As discussed in the last DIIP online meetup, to me the people that actually show up and/or are involved in the Github discussions are the ones that mostly determine what will end up in DIIPv5.
I would suggest for the next 6-8 weeks to have a weekly slot, after that we might move to a bi-weekly slot. This poll is to get the best timeslot for people's attendance. All times are in CEST.
Since Github only allows one selection for a poll. Choose your most favorable time. Then please reply with your options in order of Favor
5 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions