Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebranding "Broker" to "Realtime" #4881

Open
joepavitt opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Rebranding "Broker" to "Realtime" #4881

joepavitt opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
area:frontend For any issues that require work in the frontend/UI size:S - 2 Sizing estimation point task A piece of work that isn't necessarily tied to a specific Epic or Story.

Comments

@joepavitt
Copy link
Contributor

joepavitt commented Dec 6, 2024

Description

I've been playing Supabase recently for a personal project. It is a Postresql wrapper, but also has an offering for a pub/sub model. They brand this as "Realtime", and I really like that as a term for our own MQTT offering, it covers the scope of "UNS" and "MQTT", without being industry/UNS-specific and would cover anything else we want to introduce here.

The term is a lot more user friendly, and clearer on the value of the offering, not just the technical component involved.

Task: Change the left-side navigation option to "Realtime", and update the page description to be more onboarding/new-user friendly

Epic/Story

No response

Have you provided an initial effort estimate for this issue?

I have provided an initial effort estimate

@joepavitt joepavitt added the task A piece of work that isn't necessarily tied to a specific Epic or Story. label Dec 6, 2024
@joepavitt joepavitt added area:frontend For any issues that require work in the frontend/UI size:S - 2 Sizing estimation point labels Dec 6, 2024
@joepavitt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also came up recently with a prospect too, where they highlighted that "UNS is a buzzword... but the real value is real-time"

@gstout52
Copy link
Contributor

gstout52 commented Dec 6, 2024

I like the idea of renaming "broker" to something that is more appealing and highlights the value of the service rather than simply stating with the service is.

"Realtime" is good, but I think misses out on the fact that (correct me if I'm wrong) users will be able to make use of historical data as well. So maybe what we're really after is a name that captures the idea that you're getting a peek into your data, within FlowFuse. What if we called it something like "FlowView" and made use of our brand identity?

@hardillb
Copy link
Contributor

hardillb commented Dec 6, 2024

"FlowView" implies viewing Node-RED flows, which is very different.

It needs to be something relating to Messaging, publish/subscribe or MQTT if it's not going to be Broker

@gstout52
Copy link
Contributor

@hardillb I see your point. But is there any word that captures the value of what can be done with the broker better than "UNS" or the messaging terms you've mentioned?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:frontend For any issues that require work in the frontend/UI size:S - 2 Sizing estimation point task A piece of work that isn't necessarily tied to a specific Epic or Story.
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants