Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Breaks with nlopt-2.9.0: no member named 'LD_LBFGS_NOCEDAL' in namespace 'nlopt' #324

Open
yurivict opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@yurivict
Copy link

yurivict commented Nov 15, 2024

ff-NLopt.cpp:47:21: error: no member named 'LD_LBFGS_NOCEDAL' in namespace 'nlopt'
   47 | struct Info< nlopt::LD_LBFGS_NOCEDAL > {
      |              ~~~~~~~^
ff-NLopt.cpp:190:26: error: no member named 'LD_LBFGS_NOCEDAL' in namespace 'nlopt'
  190 | const char *Info< nlopt::LD_LBFGS_NOCEDAL >::name = "Nocedal's Low-Storage BFGS";
      |                   ~~~~~~~^
2 errors generated.

log

Could you please consider to make a release that fixes this breakage and clang-19 breakage?

Version: 4.14

@yurivict
Copy link
Author

yurivict commented Dec 7, 2024

@phtournier
The newly made release 4.15 is still broken with the latest nlopt-2.9.1
What nlopt version do you use?

Do you know when will this be fixed?

@frederichecht
Copy link
Contributor

frederichecht commented Dec 8, 2024 via email

@yurivict
Copy link
Author

yurivict commented Dec 8, 2024

nlopt-2.2.4 is very old and packages for it are not available now.

@frederichecht
Copy link
Contributor

frederichecht commented Dec 8, 2024 via email

@yurivict
Copy link
Author

@frederichecht

Hi Frederic,

How can we build FreeFem++ with nlopt-2.9.1?
The FreeBSD port is marked as broken for a quite a while now.

Could you please help to make it compatible with the latest nlopt version ?

Thank you,
Yuri

@frederichecht
Copy link
Contributor

frederichecht commented Jan 10, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants