You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While testing ACT meta related test cases, multiple rules are triggered for the same element with the issue.
I do not think this second rule should also trigger a Needs Review against the same element.
Checker rules
meta_redirect_optional is mapping to the ACT rule bisz58.
meta_refresh_delay is mapping to the ACT rule bc659a.
philljenkins
changed the title
Trigger only one rule to fail on an element, meta_redirect_optional or meta_refresh_delay
Trigger only one rule to fail on an element, meta_redirect_optional Violation not meta_refresh_delay Needs Review
Jan 28, 2025
While testing ACT meta related test cases, multiple rules are triggered for the same element with the issue.
I do not think this second rule should also trigger a Needs Review against the same element.
Checker rules
meta_redirect_optional
is mapping to the ACT rulebisz58
.meta_refresh_delay
is mapping to the ACT rulebc659a
.ACT rule bisz58 Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception) with 3 failed test cases:
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of the Checker rules fail reason codes.
meta_redirect_optional
Reason ID:fail
Violation
meta_refresh_delay
Reason ID:potential_refresh
Needs Review
I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.meta_redirect_optional
Reason ID:fail_longrefresh
Violation
meta_refresh_delay
Reason ID:potential_refresh
Needs Review
I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.meta_redirect_optional
Reason ID:fail_longrefresh
Violation
meta_refresh_delay
Reason ID:potential_refresh
Needs Review
I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.ACT rule bc659a Meta element has no refresh delay with failed test cases:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: