Hi @jp-tosca, are you still up for a PR to address this issue ? :)

Hi @DS-INRAE thanks for reaching out, it has been a while since we looked at this issue but we can bring it up to the team. This was mentioned on #10464 and reading through the comment I wonder if this last comment from @landreev is where we can pick up from this.

Yes,

What would happen if someone has multiple clients harvested into the same collection? 🤔

To be sure to understand is it the case where we have something akin to this ?

• Harvesting client "A" with Server name "Source_1" in collection Z
• Harvesting client "B" with Server name "Source_1" in collection Z
• Harvesting client "C" with Server name "Source_2" in collection Z

In this case (hopefully it's the right one), it should be
Metadata Sources :

• Source_1 : datasets harvested from A+B
• Source_2 : datasets harvested from C

Do you want me to also copy this in the comment so it stays in the thread ?

We discussed this issue again recently with @stevenferey @jeromeroucou and @luddaniel they will also be able to help answer these and further the discussion 😃

Hi @jp-tosca, are you still on the subject or can we develop it ? (not much code normally)

Sorry @luddaniel I see that I was still assigned to this but I removed myself. I will bring it up again to the team when I see Leo to see if this can be planned or prioritized.