Dtest/d_ccac.ipynb

{
 "cells": [
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 1,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "'\\n@DATE: 2024-05-08 10:09:29\\n@File: Dtest\\\\d_ccac.ipynb\\n@IDE: vscode\\n@Description:\\n    测试CCAC论辩评测效果\\n'"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 1,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "#!/usr/bin/env python\n",
    "# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-\n",
    "r\"\"\"\n",
    "@DATE: 2024-05-08 10:09:29\n",
    "@File: Dtest\\d_ccac.ipynb\n",
    "@IDE: vscode\n",
    "@Description:\n",
    "    测试CCAC论辩评测效果\n",
    "\"\"\""
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 1,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "import sys\n",
    "import os\n",
    "# 获取当前脚本所在的目录\n",
    "current_dir = %pwd\n",
    "# 构建相对路径\n",
    "relative_path = os.path.join(current_dir, '..')\n",
    "# 将相对路径添加到sys.path\n",
    "sys.path.append(relative_path)\n",
    "from Dnode import CCACNode\n",
    "from Dobserver import CCACObserver\n",
    "from Debater import CCACDebater,CCACBaseDebater\n",
    "from Djudge import CCACJudge"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 3,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "var_name = 'node'\n",
    "# topic=\"当今中国是否应该推出个人破产制度\"\n",
    "topic = \"Is social media beneficial for society? \"\n",
    "observer = CCACObserver(name=\"CCACTest-EN\")\n",
    "Judge = CCACJudge(topic=topic,observer=observer)\n",
    "\n",
    "debaterA = CCACBaseDebater(language='en')\n",
    "debaterB = CCACDebater(language='en')\n",
    "\n",
    "observer.add_debater(describe=\"正方辩手\",debater=debaterA)\n",
    "observer.add_debater(describe=\"反方辩手\",debater=debaterB)\n",
    "chathistory = []"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 4,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n",
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3m\n",
      "Invoking: `google_search` with `Is social media beneficial for society?`\n",
      "responded: I will start by drafting the argument based on the requirements provided for the topic \"Is social media beneficial for society?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[0m\u001b[36;1m\u001b[1;3mIt can help individuals connect and deepen their relationships. Social media also encourages students to learn and grow. And it can empower businesses to build their audiences and boost their bottom line. The positive effects of social media are plentiful.\u001b[0m"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:31:38.163\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m68\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：正方立论\n",
      "本环节的论述是：**Thesis Draft:**\n",
      "\n",
      "Social media, often viewed as a double-edged sword, can be beneficial for society when utilized effectively. By fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses, social media has the potential to bring about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\n",
      "\n",
      "**First Paragraph:**\n",
      "The holding method for this argument is to demonstrate the beneficial aspects of social media for society. Social media, a digital platform that enables users to create and share content, interact with others, and engage in online communities, has become an integral part of modern communication. The standard for evaluating its benefits will be based on its ability to enhance connections, promote learning, and drive business growth.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Second Paragraph (First Sub-Argument):**\n",
      "Focusing on the standard of enhancing connections, social media serves as a powerful tool for individuals to connect with friends, family, and like-minded individuals across the globe. Data shows that a significant percentage of people use social media to maintain relationships and stay connected. This data argument highlights the role of social media in bridging geographical barriers and fostering social bonds. Furthermore, academic research suggests that social media platforms provide a sense of belonging and support, contributing to overall well-being. Therefore, the argument that social media benefits society by enhancing connections is supported by both empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Third Paragraph (Second Sub-Argument):**\n",
      "Turning to the standard of promoting learning, social media offers a wealth of educational resources and opportunities for students to expand their knowledge and skills. The argument here is that social media can be a valuable educational tool when used purposefully. Data indicates that students who engage with educational content on social media demonstrate improved academic performance and critical thinking skills. This data argument underscores the educational benefits of integrating social media into learning environments. Additionally, academic studies suggest that social media can facilitate collaborative learning and information sharing among students. Thus, the argument that social media benefits society by promoting learning is supported by empirical data and academic insights.\n",
      "\n",
      "The seamless connection between the two sub-arguments highlights the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, emphasizing its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3m**Thesis Draft:**\n",
      "\n",
      "Social media, often viewed as a double-edged sword, can be beneficial for society when utilized effectively. By fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses, social media has the potential to bring about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\n",
      "\n",
      "**First Paragraph:**\n",
      "The holding method for this argument is to demonstrate the beneficial aspects of social media for society. Social media, a digital platform that enables users to create and share content, interact with others, and engage in online communities, has become an integral part of modern communication. The standard for evaluating its benefits will be based on its ability to enhance connections, promote learning, and drive business growth.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Second Paragraph (First Sub-Argument):**\n",
      "Focusing on the standard of enhancing connections, social media serves as a powerful tool for individuals to connect with friends, family, and like-minded individuals across the globe. Data shows that a significant percentage of people use social media to maintain relationships and stay connected. This data argument highlights the role of social media in bridging geographical barriers and fostering social bonds. Furthermore, academic research suggests that social media platforms provide a sense of belonging and support, contributing to overall well-being. Therefore, the argument that social media benefits society by enhancing connections is supported by both empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Third Paragraph (Second Sub-Argument):**\n",
      "Turning to the standard of promoting learning, social media offers a wealth of educational resources and opportunities for students to expand their knowledge and skills. The argument here is that social media can be a valuable educational tool when used purposefully. Data indicates that students who engage with educational content on social media demonstrate improved academic performance and critical thinking skills. This data argument underscores the educational benefits of integrating social media into learning environments. Additionally, academic studies suggest that social media can facilitate collaborative learning and information sharing among students. Thus, the argument that social media benefits society by promoting learning is supported by empirical data and academic insights.\n",
      "\n",
      "The seamless connection between the two sub-arguments highlights the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, emphasizing its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:31:45.255\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m75\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：反方立论\n",
      "本环节的论述是：To begin with, here is a draft of the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society\":\n",
      "\n",
      "Thesis Draft:\n",
      "In evaluating the impact of social media on society, the negative stance is taken. Social media, a platform for online interaction and content sharing, is often touted as a tool for connectivity and information dissemination. However, the standard of societal well-being reveals the detrimental effects overshadowing any perceived benefits.\n",
      "\n",
      "First Sub-Argument:\n",
      "The standard of societal well-being is compromised by the negative influence of social media. Data shows a rise in mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, among individuals who excessively engage with social media platforms. Studies indicate a correlation between increased social media usage and feelings of inadequacy and loneliness. Furthermore, the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions, impacting interpersonal relationships negatively. Academic research supports the notion that constant exposure to curated online content distorts perceptions of reality, contributing to a decline in overall well-being.\n",
      "\n",
      "Second Sub-Argument:\n",
      "The standard of societal well-being is further undermined by the spread of misinformation and fake news on social media. The argument revolves around the detrimental effects of false information on public discourse and decision-making processes. Data reveals the rapid dissemination of misinformation through social media channels, leading to widespread confusion and polarization within communities. Theoretical arguments suggest that the echo chamber effect created by social media algorithms reinforces existing biases and hinders critical thinking. Academic studies highlight the erosion of trust in traditional sources of information due to the prevalence of fake news on social media platforms, posing a significant threat to societal cohesion.\n",
      "\n",
      "This argumentative draft presents a comprehensive analysis of the negative impact of social media on society, focusing on the standard of societal well-being. The detailed sub-arguments highlight the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3mTo begin with, here is a draft of the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society\":\n",
      "\n",
      "Thesis Draft:\n",
      "In evaluating the impact of social media on society, the negative stance is taken. Social media, a platform for online interaction and content sharing, is often touted as a tool for connectivity and information dissemination. However, the standard of societal well-being reveals the detrimental effects overshadowing any perceived benefits.\n",
      "\n",
      "First Sub-Argument:\n",
      "The standard of societal well-being is compromised by the negative influence of social media. Data shows a rise in mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, among individuals who excessively engage with social media platforms. Studies indicate a correlation between increased social media usage and feelings of inadequacy and loneliness. Furthermore, the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions, impacting interpersonal relationships negatively. Academic research supports the notion that constant exposure to curated online content distorts perceptions of reality, contributing to a decline in overall well-being.\n",
      "\n",
      "Second Sub-Argument:\n",
      "The standard of societal well-being is further undermined by the spread of misinformation and fake news on social media. The argument revolves around the detrimental effects of false information on public discourse and decision-making processes. Data reveals the rapid dissemination of misinformation through social media channels, leading to widespread confusion and polarization within communities. Theoretical arguments suggest that the echo chamber effect created by social media algorithms reinforces existing biases and hinders critical thinking. Academic studies highlight the erosion of trust in traditional sources of information due to the prevalence of fake news on social media platforms, posing a significant threat to societal cohesion.\n",
      "\n",
      "This argumentative draft presents a comprehensive analysis of the negative impact of social media on society, focusing on the standard of societal well-being. The detailed sub-arguments highlight the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:31:55.113\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m75\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：正方驳论\n",
      "本环节的论述是：Thank you for presenting the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society.\" I will now provide a refutation based on the content of the opponent's argument.\n",
      "\n",
      "Refutation:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Mental Health Concerns:**\n",
      "   - While it is acknowledged that excessive use of social media can contribute to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression, it is essential to recognize that social media platforms also provide support networks and resources for individuals facing mental health challenges. Many online communities offer a safe space for individuals to share their experiences, seek help, and connect with others who understand their struggles. Therefore, it is not accurate to solely attribute negative mental health outcomes to social media without considering the positive impact it can have on mental health awareness and support.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Interpersonal Relationships:**\n",
      "   - The argument suggests that the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions and negatively impacts interpersonal relationships. However, it is important to note that social media can also facilitate communication and maintain relationships, especially in cases where physical distance separates individuals. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram enable people to stay connected with friends and family members across the globe, fostering relationships that might otherwise be challenging to maintain. Additionally, social media can serve as a platform for organizing social events and gatherings, enhancing real-world interactions rather than detracting from them.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Misinformation and Fake News:**\n",
      "   - While it is true that social media has been a catalyst for the spread of misinformation and fake news, it is crucial to recognize that the responsibility lies not with the platforms themselves but with the users who create and share such content. Social media companies have taken steps to combat misinformation through fact-checking initiatives, algorithm adjustments, and content moderation. Users are also encouraged to critically evaluate the information they encounter online and verify sources before sharing. Blaming social media platforms entirely for the spread of fake news overlooks the role of individual agency and critical thinking in navigating online information.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while the opponent's argument highlights valid concerns regarding the negative impact of social media on societal well-being, it is essential to consider the nuanced role that social media plays in modern society. By acknowledging both the challenges and benefits of social media usage, we can work towards maximizing its positive contributions while mitigating its potential harms.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3mThank you for presenting the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society.\" I will now provide a refutation based on the content of the opponent's argument.\n",
      "\n",
      "Refutation:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Mental Health Concerns:**\n",
      "   - While it is acknowledged that excessive use of social media can contribute to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression, it is essential to recognize that social media platforms also provide support networks and resources for individuals facing mental health challenges. Many online communities offer a safe space for individuals to share their experiences, seek help, and connect with others who understand their struggles. Therefore, it is not accurate to solely attribute negative mental health outcomes to social media without considering the positive impact it can have on mental health awareness and support.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Interpersonal Relationships:**\n",
      "   - The argument suggests that the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions and negatively impacts interpersonal relationships. However, it is important to note that social media can also facilitate communication and maintain relationships, especially in cases where physical distance separates individuals. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram enable people to stay connected with friends and family members across the globe, fostering relationships that might otherwise be challenging to maintain. Additionally, social media can serve as a platform for organizing social events and gatherings, enhancing real-world interactions rather than detracting from them.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Misinformation and Fake News:**\n",
      "   - While it is true that social media has been a catalyst for the spread of misinformation and fake news, it is crucial to recognize that the responsibility lies not with the platforms themselves but with the users who create and share such content. Social media companies have taken steps to combat misinformation through fact-checking initiatives, algorithm adjustments, and content moderation. Users are also encouraged to critically evaluate the information they encounter online and verify sources before sharing. Blaming social media platforms entirely for the spread of fake news overlooks the role of individual agency and critical thinking in navigating online information.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while the opponent's argument highlights valid concerns regarding the negative impact of social media on societal well-being, it is essential to consider the nuanced role that social media plays in modern society. By acknowledging both the challenges and benefits of social media usage, we can work towards maximizing its positive contributions while mitigating its potential harms.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:32:04.104\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m75\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：反方驳论\n",
      "本环节的论述是：The opponent's argument presents a well-structured case for the benefits of social media in society, focusing on enhancing connections and promoting learning. While the argument is compelling, there are several points that can be refuted based on logical reasoning and counterarguments.\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Overlooking Negative Impacts:**\n",
      "The opponent's argument solely focuses on the positive aspects of social media, neglecting to address the significant negative impacts it can have on individuals and society. Social media has been associated with issues such as cyberbullying, misinformation, privacy breaches, and mental health concerns. Ignoring these negative consequences presents an incomplete picture of the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Selective Use of Data:**\n",
      "The opponent relies heavily on data to support their claims about the benefits of social media. However, the data presented may be selective and not representative of the broader effects of social media. It is essential to consider a wide range of studies and research findings to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of social media on connections and learning.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Limited Scope of Analysis:**\n",
      "While the opponent emphasizes the role of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, they overlook other critical aspects of its influence on society. For example, the impact of social media on political polarization, societal divisions, and the spread of misinformation is significant and warrants consideration in evaluating its overall benefits to society.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Assumption of Purposeful Use:**\n",
      "The argument assumes that social media is used purposefully for enhancing connections and promoting learning. In reality, social media usage is often driven by entertainment, self-promotion, and validation-seeking behaviors, which may not contribute positively to societal well-being. It is crucial to acknowledge the diverse motivations behind social media usage and their potential implications.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Lack of Long-Term Studies:**\n",
      "The opponent's argument relies on existing data and academic insights to support the benefits of social media. However, the long-term effects of prolonged social media use on individuals and society are still not fully understood. Longitudinal studies are necessary to assess the sustained impact of social media on relationships, learning outcomes, and overall societal well-being.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while the opponent's argument highlights some valid points about the potential benefits of social media for society, it is essential to consider the broader context, including the negative impacts, data reliability, societal implications, user motivations, and long-term effects. A comprehensive evaluation of social media's role in society requires a balanced assessment of both its positive and negative aspects.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3mThe opponent's argument presents a well-structured case for the benefits of social media in society, focusing on enhancing connections and promoting learning. While the argument is compelling, there are several points that can be refuted based on logical reasoning and counterarguments.\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Overlooking Negative Impacts:**\n",
      "The opponent's argument solely focuses on the positive aspects of social media, neglecting to address the significant negative impacts it can have on individuals and society. Social media has been associated with issues such as cyberbullying, misinformation, privacy breaches, and mental health concerns. Ignoring these negative consequences presents an incomplete picture of the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Selective Use of Data:**\n",
      "The opponent relies heavily on data to support their claims about the benefits of social media. However, the data presented may be selective and not representative of the broader effects of social media. It is essential to consider a wide range of studies and research findings to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of social media on connections and learning.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Limited Scope of Analysis:**\n",
      "While the opponent emphasizes the role of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, they overlook other critical aspects of its influence on society. For example, the impact of social media on political polarization, societal divisions, and the spread of misinformation is significant and warrants consideration in evaluating its overall benefits to society.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Assumption of Purposeful Use:**\n",
      "The argument assumes that social media is used purposefully for enhancing connections and promoting learning. In reality, social media usage is often driven by entertainment, self-promotion, and validation-seeking behaviors, which may not contribute positively to societal well-being. It is crucial to acknowledge the diverse motivations behind social media usage and their potential implications.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Lack of Long-Term Studies:**\n",
      "The opponent's argument relies on existing data and academic insights to support the benefits of social media. However, the long-term effects of prolonged social media use on individuals and society are still not fully understood. Longitudinal studies are necessary to assess the sustained impact of social media on relationships, learning outcomes, and overall societal well-being.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while the opponent's argument highlights some valid points about the potential benefits of social media for society, it is essential to consider the broader context, including the negative impacts, data reliability, societal implications, user motivations, and long-term effects. A comprehensive evaluation of social media's role in society requires a balanced assessment of both its positive and negative aspects.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:32:11.323\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m75\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：正方结辩\n",
      "本环节的论述是：Based on the previous arguments presented by both parties, the affirmative side emphasizes the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, highlighting its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way. The affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can foster connections, facilitate learning, and empower businesses, bringing about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\n",
      "\n",
      "On the other hand, the negative side argues against the statement that social media is beneficial for society, focusing on the detrimental effects on societal well-being. The negative side highlights the negative influence of social media on mental health, interpersonal relationships, and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.\n",
      "\n",
      "In response to the negative arguments, the affirmative side refutes the concerns raised by acknowledging the positive impact of social media on mental health awareness and support, the role of social media in maintaining relationships, and the shared responsibility in combating misinformation. The affirmative side emphasizes the nuanced role of social media in modern society, recognizing both its challenges and benefits.\n",
      "\n",
      "However, the negative side counters the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments, it is essential to consider a balanced assessment of the positive and negative aspects of social media in society. By acknowledging the complexities and potential consequences of social media usage, we can strive towards maximizing its benefits while mitigating its harms for the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3mBased on the previous arguments presented by both parties, the affirmative side emphasizes the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, highlighting its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way. The affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can foster connections, facilitate learning, and empower businesses, bringing about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\n",
      "\n",
      "On the other hand, the negative side argues against the statement that social media is beneficial for society, focusing on the detrimental effects on societal well-being. The negative side highlights the negative influence of social media on mental health, interpersonal relationships, and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.\n",
      "\n",
      "In response to the negative arguments, the affirmative side refutes the concerns raised by acknowledging the positive impact of social media on mental health awareness and support, the role of social media in maintaining relationships, and the shared responsibility in combating misinformation. The affirmative side emphasizes the nuanced role of social media in modern society, recognizing both its challenges and benefits.\n",
      "\n",
      "However, the negative side counters the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "In conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments, it is essential to consider a balanced assessment of the positive and negative aspects of social media in society. By acknowledging the complexities and potential consequences of social media usage, we can strive towards maximizing its benefits while mitigating its harms for the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Entering new AgentExecutor chain...\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stderr",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32m2024-05-10 11:32:17.948\u001b[0m | \u001b[1mINFO    \u001b[0m | \u001b[36mDobserver.ccacobserver\u001b[0m:\u001b[36mlog\u001b[0m:\u001b[36m75\u001b[0m - \u001b[1m\n",
      "当前环节为：反方结辩\n",
      "本环节的论述是：Summary of the arguments presented by both parties:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Thesis Draft (Affirmative Side):**\n",
      "The affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can bring about positive impacts on society by fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses. They emphasize the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, supported by empirical data and academic insights.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Argument Against (Negative Side):**\n",
      "The negative side takes a critical stance on the impact of social media on society, highlighting the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation. They argue that the negative influence of social media compromises societal well-being, leading to issues such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, and the erosion of trust in information sources.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Refutation of Negative Side by Affirmative Side:**\n",
      "The affirmative side refutes the negative arguments by acknowledging the challenges but also highlighting the positive aspects of social media, such as providing support networks for mental health, facilitating communication for interpersonal relationships, and emphasizing individual responsibility in combating misinformation.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Refutation of Affirmative Side by Negative Side:**\n",
      "The negative side refutes the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "Closing Draft:\n",
      "In conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments regarding the impact of social media on society, it is evident that social media is a complex and multifaceted tool that can have both positive and negative consequences. It is essential to consider a balanced perspective that acknowledges the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, while also addressing the challenges it poses in terms of mental health, misinformation, and societal well-being. By recognizing the nuances of social media usage and advocating for responsible and informed engagement, we can strive towards maximizing its positive contributions and mitigating its potential harms in society.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "\u001b[32;1m\u001b[1;3mSummary of the arguments presented by both parties:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Thesis Draft (Affirmative Side):**\n",
      "The affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can bring about positive impacts on society by fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses. They emphasize the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, supported by empirical data and academic insights.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Argument Against (Negative Side):**\n",
      "The negative side takes a critical stance on the impact of social media on society, highlighting the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation. They argue that the negative influence of social media compromises societal well-being, leading to issues such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, and the erosion of trust in information sources.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Refutation of Negative Side by Affirmative Side:**\n",
      "The affirmative side refutes the negative arguments by acknowledging the challenges but also highlighting the positive aspects of social media, such as providing support networks for mental health, facilitating communication for interpersonal relationships, and emphasizing individual responsibility in combating misinformation.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Refutation of Affirmative Side by Negative Side:**\n",
      "The negative side refutes the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\n",
      "\n",
      "Closing Draft:\n",
      "In conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments regarding the impact of social media on society, it is evident that social media is a complex and multifaceted tool that can have both positive and negative consequences. It is essential to consider a balanced perspective that acknowledges the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, while also addressing the challenges it poses in terms of mental health, misinformation, and societal well-being. By recognizing the nuances of social media usage and advocating for responsible and informed engagement, we can strive towards maximizing its positive contributions and mitigating its potential harms in society.\u001b[0m\n",
      "\n",
      "\u001b[1m> Finished chain.\u001b[0m\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "for i in range(1,observer.max_round+1):\n",
    "    node_name = f'{var_name}{i}'    \n",
    "    if 1<=i<3:\n",
    "        context = topic\n",
    "    elif i==3:\n",
    "        context = chathistory[1]\n",
    "    elif i==4:\n",
    "        context = chathistory[0]\n",
    "    elif i>=5:\n",
    "        context = chathistory[0:4]\n",
    "    globals()[node_name] = Judge.new_node(context=context)\n",
    "    \n",
    "\n",
    "    observer.update_node(globals()[node_name])\n",
    "    observer.update()\n",
    "    chathistory.append(f\"{observer.round_name}:{observer.node.content}\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 6,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "['正方立论:**Thesis Draft:**\\n\\nSocial media, often viewed as a double-edged sword, can be beneficial for society when utilized effectively. By fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses, social media has the potential to bring about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\\n\\n**First Paragraph:**\\nThe holding method for this argument is to demonstrate the beneficial aspects of social media for society. Social media, a digital platform that enables users to create and share content, interact with others, and engage in online communities, has become an integral part of modern communication. The standard for evaluating its benefits will be based on its ability to enhance connections, promote learning, and drive business growth.\\n\\n**Second Paragraph (First Sub-Argument):**\\nFocusing on the standard of enhancing connections, social media serves as a powerful tool for individuals to connect with friends, family, and like-minded individuals across the globe. Data shows that a significant percentage of people use social media to maintain relationships and stay connected. This data argument highlights the role of social media in bridging geographical barriers and fostering social bonds. Furthermore, academic research suggests that social media platforms provide a sense of belonging and support, contributing to overall well-being. Therefore, the argument that social media benefits society by enhancing connections is supported by both empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives.\\n\\n**Third Paragraph (Second Sub-Argument):**\\nTurning to the standard of promoting learning, social media offers a wealth of educational resources and opportunities for students to expand their knowledge and skills. The argument here is that social media can be a valuable educational tool when used purposefully. Data indicates that students who engage with educational content on social media demonstrate improved academic performance and critical thinking skills. This data argument underscores the educational benefits of integrating social media into learning environments. Additionally, academic studies suggest that social media can facilitate collaborative learning and information sharing among students. Thus, the argument that social media benefits society by promoting learning is supported by empirical data and academic insights.\\n\\nThe seamless connection between the two sub-arguments highlights the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, emphasizing its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way.',\n",
       " '反方立论:To begin with, here is a draft of the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society\":\\n\\nThesis Draft:\\nIn evaluating the impact of social media on society, the negative stance is taken. Social media, a platform for online interaction and content sharing, is often touted as a tool for connectivity and information dissemination. However, the standard of societal well-being reveals the detrimental effects overshadowing any perceived benefits.\\n\\nFirst Sub-Argument:\\nThe standard of societal well-being is compromised by the negative influence of social media. Data shows a rise in mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, among individuals who excessively engage with social media platforms. Studies indicate a correlation between increased social media usage and feelings of inadequacy and loneliness. Furthermore, the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions, impacting interpersonal relationships negatively. Academic research supports the notion that constant exposure to curated online content distorts perceptions of reality, contributing to a decline in overall well-being.\\n\\nSecond Sub-Argument:\\nThe standard of societal well-being is further undermined by the spread of misinformation and fake news on social media. The argument revolves around the detrimental effects of false information on public discourse and decision-making processes. Data reveals the rapid dissemination of misinformation through social media channels, leading to widespread confusion and polarization within communities. Theoretical arguments suggest that the echo chamber effect created by social media algorithms reinforces existing biases and hinders critical thinking. Academic studies highlight the erosion of trust in traditional sources of information due to the prevalence of fake news on social media platforms, posing a significant threat to societal cohesion.\\n\\nThis argumentative draft presents a comprehensive analysis of the negative impact of social media on society, focusing on the standard of societal well-being. The detailed sub-arguments highlight the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.',\n",
       " '正方驳论:Thank you for presenting the argument against the statement \"Is social media beneficial for society.\" I will now provide a refutation based on the content of the opponent\\'s argument.\\n\\nRefutation:\\n\\n1. **Mental Health Concerns:**\\n   - While it is acknowledged that excessive use of social media can contribute to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression, it is essential to recognize that social media platforms also provide support networks and resources for individuals facing mental health challenges. Many online communities offer a safe space for individuals to share their experiences, seek help, and connect with others who understand their struggles. Therefore, it is not accurate to solely attribute negative mental health outcomes to social media without considering the positive impact it can have on mental health awareness and support.\\n\\n2. **Interpersonal Relationships:**\\n   - The argument suggests that the addictive nature of social media leads to decreased real-world social interactions and negatively impacts interpersonal relationships. However, it is important to note that social media can also facilitate communication and maintain relationships, especially in cases where physical distance separates individuals. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram enable people to stay connected with friends and family members across the globe, fostering relationships that might otherwise be challenging to maintain. Additionally, social media can serve as a platform for organizing social events and gatherings, enhancing real-world interactions rather than detracting from them.\\n\\n3. **Misinformation and Fake News:**\\n   - While it is true that social media has been a catalyst for the spread of misinformation and fake news, it is crucial to recognize that the responsibility lies not with the platforms themselves but with the users who create and share such content. Social media companies have taken steps to combat misinformation through fact-checking initiatives, algorithm adjustments, and content moderation. Users are also encouraged to critically evaluate the information they encounter online and verify sources before sharing. Blaming social media platforms entirely for the spread of fake news overlooks the role of individual agency and critical thinking in navigating online information.\\n\\nIn conclusion, while the opponent\\'s argument highlights valid concerns regarding the negative impact of social media on societal well-being, it is essential to consider the nuanced role that social media plays in modern society. By acknowledging both the challenges and benefits of social media usage, we can work towards maximizing its positive contributions while mitigating its potential harms.',\n",
       " \"反方驳论:The opponent's argument presents a well-structured case for the benefits of social media in society, focusing on enhancing connections and promoting learning. While the argument is compelling, there are several points that can be refuted based on logical reasoning and counterarguments.\\n\\n1. **Overlooking Negative Impacts:**\\nThe opponent's argument solely focuses on the positive aspects of social media, neglecting to address the significant negative impacts it can have on individuals and society. Social media has been associated with issues such as cyberbullying, misinformation, privacy breaches, and mental health concerns. Ignoring these negative consequences presents an incomplete picture of the overall impact of social media on society.\\n\\n2. **Selective Use of Data:**\\nThe opponent relies heavily on data to support their claims about the benefits of social media. However, the data presented may be selective and not representative of the broader effects of social media. It is essential to consider a wide range of studies and research findings to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of social media on connections and learning.\\n\\n3. **Limited Scope of Analysis:**\\nWhile the opponent emphasizes the role of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, they overlook other critical aspects of its influence on society. For example, the impact of social media on political polarization, societal divisions, and the spread of misinformation is significant and warrants consideration in evaluating its overall benefits to society.\\n\\n4. **Assumption of Purposeful Use:**\\nThe argument assumes that social media is used purposefully for enhancing connections and promoting learning. In reality, social media usage is often driven by entertainment, self-promotion, and validation-seeking behaviors, which may not contribute positively to societal well-being. It is crucial to acknowledge the diverse motivations behind social media usage and their potential implications.\\n\\n5. **Lack of Long-Term Studies:**\\nThe opponent's argument relies on existing data and academic insights to support the benefits of social media. However, the long-term effects of prolonged social media use on individuals and society are still not fully understood. Longitudinal studies are necessary to assess the sustained impact of social media on relationships, learning outcomes, and overall societal well-being.\\n\\nIn conclusion, while the opponent's argument highlights some valid points about the potential benefits of social media for society, it is essential to consider the broader context, including the negative impacts, data reliability, societal implications, user motivations, and long-term effects. A comprehensive evaluation of social media's role in society requires a balanced assessment of both its positive and negative aspects.\",\n",
       " '正方结辩:Based on the previous arguments presented by both parties, the affirmative side emphasizes the multifaceted benefits of social media for society, highlighting its potential to enhance connections and promote learning in a meaningful way. The affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can foster connections, facilitate learning, and empower businesses, bringing about positive impacts on individuals, students, and businesses.\\n\\nOn the other hand, the negative side argues against the statement that social media is beneficial for society, focusing on the detrimental effects on societal well-being. The negative side highlights the negative influence of social media on mental health, interpersonal relationships, and the spread of misinformation, supported by data, theoretical arguments, and academic research.\\n\\nIn response to the negative arguments, the affirmative side refutes the concerns raised by acknowledging the positive impact of social media on mental health awareness and support, the role of social media in maintaining relationships, and the shared responsibility in combating misinformation. The affirmative side emphasizes the nuanced role of social media in modern society, recognizing both its challenges and benefits.\\n\\nHowever, the negative side counters the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\\n\\nIn conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments, it is essential to consider a balanced assessment of the positive and negative aspects of social media in society. By acknowledging the complexities and potential consequences of social media usage, we can strive towards maximizing its benefits while mitigating its harms for the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.',\n",
       " '反方结辩:Summary of the arguments presented by both parties:\\n\\n**Thesis Draft (Affirmative Side):**\\nThe affirmative side argues that social media, when utilized effectively, can bring about positive impacts on society by fostering connections, facilitating learning, and empowering businesses. They emphasize the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, supported by empirical data and academic insights.\\n\\n**Argument Against (Negative Side):**\\nThe negative side takes a critical stance on the impact of social media on society, highlighting the detrimental effects on mental health and the spread of misinformation. They argue that the negative influence of social media compromises societal well-being, leading to issues such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, and the erosion of trust in information sources.\\n\\n**Refutation of Negative Side by Affirmative Side:**\\nThe affirmative side refutes the negative arguments by acknowledging the challenges but also highlighting the positive aspects of social media, such as providing support networks for mental health, facilitating communication for interpersonal relationships, and emphasizing individual responsibility in combating misinformation.\\n\\n**Refutation of Affirmative Side by Negative Side:**\\nThe negative side refutes the affirmative arguments by pointing out the overlooking of negative impacts, selective use of data, limited scope of analysis, assumption of purposeful use, and the lack of long-term studies in evaluating the overall impact of social media on society.\\n\\nClosing Draft:\\nIn conclusion, while both sides present compelling arguments regarding the impact of social media on society, it is evident that social media is a complex and multifaceted tool that can have both positive and negative consequences. It is essential to consider a balanced perspective that acknowledges the benefits of social media in enhancing connections and promoting learning, while also addressing the challenges it poses in terms of mental health, misinformation, and societal well-being. By recognizing the nuances of social media usage and advocating for responsible and informed engagement, we can strive towards maximizing its positive contributions and mitigating its potential harms in society.']"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 6,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "chathistory"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": []
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "kernelspec": {
   "display_name": "DoT",
   "language": "python",
   "name": "python3"
  },
  "language_info": {
   "codemirror_mode": {
    "name": "ipython",
    "version": 3
   },
   "file_extension": ".py",
   "mimetype": "text/x-python",
   "name": "python",
   "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
   "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
   "version": "3.9.18"
  }
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 2
}