@Kkenjji We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
Example from src/main/java/clank/command/DeleteCommand.java lines 13-13:
private boolean toDeleteAll = false;
Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from src/main/java/clank/Clank.java lines 58-61:
/**
* The main entry point of the Clank chatbot.
* @param args Command-line arguments (not used).
*/
Example from src/main/java/clank/Launcher.java lines 11-16:
/**
* The main entry point of the application.
* Calls {@link Application#launch(Class, String...)} to start the JavaFX application.
*
* @param args Command-line arguments (not used).
*/
Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Messages
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.
@Kkenjji We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
Example from
src/main/java/clank/command/DeleteCommand.javalines13-13:Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from
src/main/java/clank/Clank.javalines58-61:Example from
src/main/java/clank/Launcher.javalines11-16:Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Messages
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact
[email protected]if you want to follow up on this post.