In your paper, you discuss the "simultaneous" setting, where the robot is permitted to move from the beginning of the episode. However, in the provided codebase, the _TIME_WAIT parameter is set to 1.5 seconds for the simultaneous setting and 3.0 seconds for the sequential setting (source). I'm curious about why there is a non-zero _TIME_WAIT for the simultaneous setting.
Additionally, in the "Reproducing CVPR 2023 Results" section, the paper provides some .npz files. Is it possible to independently test the model and generate these .npz files using the specified final model directories (e.g., output/cvpr2023_models/2022-10-16_08-48-30_finetune_5_s0_train)? Can the testing command below be used for this purpose?
GADDPG_DIR=GA-DDPG CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python examples/test.py \
--model-dir output/cvpr2023_models/2022-10-16_08-48-30_finetune_5_s0_train \
--without-hold \
SIM.RENDER True
I would appreciate any clarification on these points.
In your paper, you discuss the "simultaneous" setting, where the robot is permitted to move from the beginning of the episode. However, in the provided codebase, the _TIME_WAIT parameter is set to 1.5 seconds for the simultaneous setting and 3.0 seconds for the sequential setting (source). I'm curious about why there is a non-zero _TIME_WAIT for the simultaneous setting.
Additionally, in the "Reproducing CVPR 2023 Results" section, the paper provides some .npz files. Is it possible to independently test the model and generate these .npz files using the specified final model directories (e.g., output/cvpr2023_models/2022-10-16_08-48-30_finetune_5_s0_train)? Can the testing command below be used for this purpose?
I would appreciate any clarification on these points.