-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Consider exactextract as backend #109
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
refactorCode improvements that do not change functionalityCode improvements that do not change functionalitytopic-python-zonal-statsIssues/pull requests related to python zonal statistics codeIssues/pull requests related to python zonal statistics code
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
refactorCode improvements that do not change functionalityCode improvements that do not change functionalitytopic-python-zonal-statsIssues/pull requests related to python zonal statistics codeIssues/pull requests related to python zonal statistics code
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for Feature.
Consider exactextract as backend for zonal statistics. Seems like their list of statistics is comprehensive, and the library should be performant (written in C++).
As a bonus, they are compatible with
rasterioandxarrayout of the box. The biggest downside is a lack of documentation, but that may not be a big deal.Ultimately, we should go with what makes most sense from the benchmarks (maybe even allow both backend types?)