What editor should we use? #5
MikeDev101
started this conversation in
Development
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
At the time that I wrote that, I had no idea that Turbowarp had an editor. Since we are now using Turbowarp for project loading, we will also be using Turbowarp's editor if possible. However, we will have some fun with licensing because Turbowarp is LGPL3 and this project is MIT. I might consider switching to the LGPL, but the only downside is that LGPL may not be compatible with some app stores. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As mentioned in https://github.com/JTechnologies/Polaris/projects/1#card-64583208, we should use E羊icques.
However, wouldn't Turbowarp be a better option? They both share the custom extension / direct file loading functionality and Turbowarp has better performance optimization features.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions