-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Codereview digital signature #169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
please provide an update / status on this issue ( in a comment) and tag @ds-bellcom in this status please also provide
I expect discussions regarding the review to be documentet in this issus and issues identifyed during the review to be raised at child issues |
Hi @ChatBotBerg and @ds-bellcom, We have started doing codereview. We have requested changes and are now awaiting Bellcom. /Line |
@ds-bellcom: Please provide details regarding progress in implementing the required changes, providing me with a delivery date for digital signatur. Best/Anna-Lis |
Hi @lilosti and @ChatBotBerg. I have now answered @rimi-itk question regarding #167 and are now awaiting review from ITK. Depending on what ITK returns with after review, we expect to be able to deliver the solution approx 1-2 weeks after review. @lilosti, will you let me know when ITK are done with the review? |
@ds-bellcom, a pull request with 4 failing code checks is not ready for review: https://github.com/OS2Forms/os2forms/actions/runs/14616182422 |
I'm not sure in which order you expect thing to happen, but I've added some comments on #167. Most are about inconsistencies within the new code and with the rest of the https://github.com/OS2Forms/os2forms project, and many of them could (probably) have been detected by proper code checks. |
Hi @lilosti and @ChatBotBerg. Stan has changed what @rimi-itk found in his review. Stan has asked @rimi-itk to make a new review. Would you please let me know when @rimi-itk has made a new review? |
We have been asked to do at codereview of the digital signature PR. Any discussions about the codereview should be added as comments to this - or on the PR (depending on the nature of the discussion).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: