Replies: 4 comments
-
|
This is a great list! In addition, I would add:
Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for opening this discussion, I will start a comment here and will keep adding to it whenever I have something:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Adding a few:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
pyFAST has been renamed to Please continue the discussion in this new repository. Sorry for the inconvenience. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been chatting with people offline about the scripts for FAST.Farm case generation and after PRs #64 and #66 I think it could be worthwhile start a discussion to understand the need of those using it and how to make it better. That piece of code is still very much a work in progress.
Here's a running list of bug fixes, improvements, and general ideas I compiled (in no particular order) after talking to @lucas-carmo and @MYMahfouz
LESpathand add a way to specify what type of inflow will be executed (see here). We could potentially create aninflowTypewith options beingLES,TS, orMann.binsvariable an input. The presence of that input can mean that this is a floating turbine case, or we can have an explicit entryfloating=<bool>like suggested in the PRs linked above. The amount and input entries on the array ofbinscan be freely modified by the user and wouldn't be restricted to the ones in the example.This is what I have on the top of my head, but I wanted to get opinions/feedback/suggestions on priority and needs before moving forward.
@jjonkman
Edit:
Adding items:
nSeeds!=6nSeedsto the example input. People seem to not be checking all the inputs toFFCaseCreationroundfunction to offset parameters, like here and herepartitionoption to*slurm_submitmethodsCompSubon turbine models)TSCaseCreationfor the high-res boxesTSCaseCreationclass the resolution of the high-res boxes is determined by the modeling guidelines, which is the max chord (e.g. 5 m for the IEA 15 MW). Sometimes, we may want to pass a more coarse value, but there is no need as the high-res TurbSim boxes generation is not a bottleneck ever. The variableds_high_leswithin the class is not used at all when setting up TurbSim-driven cases. The grid specs written to the FAST.Farm input file are obtaining by reading outputs of TurbSim, so the grid information comes from there, not theds_high_lesvariable. Note that this variable is only used for checks on LES-driven cases, to ensure specifications are consistent. The variable is never directly used.TS_high_create_symlinksomewhere inFF_setup_TSBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions