Why are some environmental conditions arbitrarily discretised? #738
Replies: 3 comments
-
Hey! Environmental conditions are often not measured very precisely, imagine a real world drive somewhere and the driver would need to document and classify the current rain intensity. Having a double field would just create the illusion of precision. If your modlling requires discrete values I recommend to make a proposal to add e.g additional continous values without breaking backwards compatibility and allowing for more precise values not allowing them to contradict.
There is also a modelling working group and I suppose they have formed some opinions around it alrady. @PhRosenberger may know something here? Best regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, I have already collected several discussions/issues/PRs on that topic and I would be glad if you, @mansoor2016, would join our project to elaborate on that topic! Here is a starting point for that: #601 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looks like the suggestions in #601 would resolve this discussion, closing this now. Thanks @jdsika & @PhRosenberger |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The precipitation intensity is provided as a discrete enum. why? It is not consistent for all env. conditions.
If you develop regression models for environmental effects, likely you will need continuous inputs.
Providing a double value field + a confidence level field would be a more useable design.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions