You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have an interesting use case for Questionnaire:
We want teachers to fill out and submit the form for each student. This would be used for evaluation and other purposes that can be directly beneficial within a classroom.
Basically we want to reverse the workflow from teachers collecting the student submitted forms to the student viewing what the teacher has submitted for them.
We are wondering if:
Is this even possible, given you know the code?
What would it take to get it done?
Great plugin and we use it quite regularly.
Thank you,
Chris
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You could just create a dropdown question and get the teacher to select the relevant student when filling the form. That has worked well for us.
Though to keep this idea running of teachers filling form for/about students, one thing we have been asked is to be able to allocate the forms for particular students to particular teachers. If there was a question type where we could do that, that would be pretty cool & useful.
Is there a question type that would auto-populate based on student role?
Problem is the students being evaluated by the teacher change and is fluid at times. It would be a nightmare trying to keep the question populated with current students for the teacher to evaluate using the form without a mechanism to populate the form.
We have an interesting use case for Questionnaire:
We want teachers to fill out and submit the form for each student. This would be used for evaluation and other purposes that can be directly beneficial within a classroom.
Basically we want to reverse the workflow from teachers collecting the student submitted forms to the student viewing what the teacher has submitted for them.
We are wondering if:
Great plugin and we use it quite regularly.
Thank you,
Chris
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: