Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[request] Performance of pcl::KdTreeFLANN #5663

Closed
jujimeizuo opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

[request] Performance of pcl::KdTreeFLANN #5663

jujimeizuo opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
kind: question Type of issue

Comments

@jujimeizuo
Copy link

In the kdtree module, has the performance comparison between pcl::KdTreeFLANN and libnabo passed the benchmark test? Because the performance of libnabo is said to be good, I would like to ask.

@jujimeizuo jujimeizuo added the status: triage Labels incomplete label Apr 13, 2023
@mvieth
Copy link
Member

mvieth commented Apr 13, 2023

At the moment, PCL does not use or support libnabo, and there are currently no plans to change this. We have not done any performance comparison between FLANN and libnabo.

@larshg
Copy link
Contributor

larshg commented Apr 13, 2023

For reference, there is #5299, which looks into using nanoflann as an alternative as well or FLANN CUDA.

@jujimeizuo
Copy link
Author

For reference, there is #5299, which looks into using nanoflann as an alternative as well or FLANN CUDA.

Thank you, I mainly want to know who has the best performance among all kdtrees. And get the result through benchmark.

@yasamoka
Copy link
Contributor

Check this out:

https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks

@larshg larshg added kind: question Type of issue and removed status: triage Labels incomplete labels May 9, 2023
@larshg larshg closed this as completed May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: question Type of issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants