You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the correct way to specify a variable modification that should only be present on an aminoacid modified with the crosslinker (e.g. oxidation)?
Specifying it via modification:variable will lead to unnecessary increased search space, but using the MODIFICATIONS word inside of the crosslinker definition will define a variable modification on both cross-linked and linear peptides modified with the crosslinker, correct?
Is is possible to only consider the variable modification on the crosslinked peptides?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yes, the modification word will define it on both peptide pairs and linear peptides modified with the crosslinker.
I am not aware of a feature directly doing what you are requesting, sorry. If I understand correctly, you should be able to to achieve it by defining your main crosslinker as usual. Then, include a second line with an additional crosslinker with a different name that incorporates the mass of the crosslinker and the modificaiton, and then not specifying any MODIFICATIONS for that crosslinker. Let me know if that works!
What is the correct way to specify a variable modification that should only be present on an aminoacid modified with the crosslinker (e.g. oxidation)?
Specifying it via modification:variable will lead to unnecessary increased search space, but using the MODIFICATIONS word inside of the crosslinker definition will define a variable modification on both cross-linked and linear peptides modified with the crosslinker, correct?
Is is possible to only consider the variable modification on the crosslinked peptides?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: