Problem
The project tokenizes Real-World Assets but has no documentation mapping its data model to regulatory standards like UN/CEFACT (United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business) or the relevant securities regulation frameworks.
Expected Behavior
A docs/compliance/ directory with documents explaining:
- How the contract data model maps to UN/CEFACT Buy-Ship-Pay reference data model
- KYC/AML compliance approach (levels, expiry, provider tracking)
- Securities law considerations (accredited investor checks, transfer restrictions)
- Jurisdiction-specific considerations (EU MiCA, US SEC regs, UAE VARA, etc.)
Proposed Solution
Create the following documents:
docs/compliance/un-cefact-mapping.md — Maps contract types to UN/CEFACT semantics
docs/compliance/securities-regulation.md — How the contract features address regulatory requirements
docs/compliance/kyc-aml.md — KYC architecture and provider model
This documentation is essential for institutional adoption and regulatory review.
Problem
The project tokenizes Real-World Assets but has no documentation mapping its data model to regulatory standards like UN/CEFACT (United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business) or the relevant securities regulation frameworks.
Expected Behavior
A
docs/compliance/directory with documents explaining:Proposed Solution
Create the following documents:
docs/compliance/un-cefact-mapping.md— Maps contract types to UN/CEFACT semanticsdocs/compliance/securities-regulation.md— How the contract features address regulatory requirementsdocs/compliance/kyc-aml.md— KYC architecture and provider modelThis documentation is essential for institutional adoption and regulatory review.