You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue
The check produces a high number of false positives. Here are some examples where this can be observed:
The check does also report findings for messages in text pools which makes no sense. Example code:
data lv_etext type c length 100.
lv_etext = 'No authority to replay'(e12).
message lv_etext type 'I'.
The check reports findings for messages that are thrown without the use of a message class (at least when you add a RAISING to the statement). Example code:
data l_text type string.
l_text = 'success'.
message l_text type 'I' raising a.
Even when the message class and message number are correctly defined with literals, the check raises a finding as soon as the addition 'WITH' or 'RAISING' or both of them are used. Example Code:
message id '/AIF/BDC' type 'E' number '013' with iv_typename raising a.
I also found many cases where the statement was completely fine and the check still reported a finding, but I wasn't able to see a pattern when this happens and when not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Check Name
Message Easy To Find
Issue
The check produces a high number of false positives. Here are some examples where this can be observed:
The check does also report findings for messages in text pools which makes no sense. Example code:
data lv_etext type c length 100.
lv_etext = 'No authority to replay'(e12).
message lv_etext type 'I'.
The check reports findings for messages that are thrown without the use of a message class (at least when you add a RAISING to the statement). Example code:
data l_text type string.
l_text = 'success'.
message l_text type 'I' raising a.
Even when the message class and message number are correctly defined with literals, the check raises a finding as soon as the addition 'WITH' or 'RAISING' or both of them are used. Example Code:
message id '/AIF/BDC' type 'E' number '013' with iv_typename raising a.
I also found many cases where the statement was completely fine and the check still reported a finding, but I wasn't able to see a pattern when this happens and when not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: