You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in Slack. DiffEqArray is a convenient way to reduce Solution type and wrap (u,t) results, it seems reasonable to add optional retcode field to DiffEqArray. What do you think? My current setup is: I run ensemble simulations and reduce each simulation to a DiffEqArray storing just (u,t) . Some parameters sets may result in Unstable retcode or Terminated if some termination criteria is present. To filter such simulations I define a solution type like
struct MySol
sol::DiffEqArray
retcode::Symbol
end
to save both solution and it's retcode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed in Slack.
DiffEqArray
is a convenient way to reduce Solution type and wrap(u,t)
results, it seems reasonable to add optionalretcode
field toDiffEqArray
. What do you think? My current setup is: I run ensemble simulations and reduce each simulation to aDiffEqArray
storing just(u,t)
. Some parameters sets may result inUnstable
retcode orTerminated
if some termination criteria is present. To filter such simulations I define a solution type liketo save both solution and it's retcode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: