Skip to content

intro/discovery/discovery rid out of Xorm #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
vidya88 opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

intro/discovery/discovery rid out of Xorm #5

vidya88 opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@vidya88
Copy link

vidya88 commented Sep 19, 2019

@logrusorgru commented on Apr 18, 2018

The xorm drops (*xorm.Rows).Next() error and (*xorm.Rows).Err() can only returns sql.ErrNoRows. Since, CXO have a little SLQ work, then I think CXO should rid out of the xorm to

  • avoid unnecessary dependency
  • handle possible error

The work is faster then time of waiting reply from xorm developers.

Work: 50% (in progress, next after #147)
Test: 0%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant