CatBoostLSS implementation still of interest? #10
StatMixedML
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for your work on this @StatMixedML. I voted yes, as Catboost currently still has the best-out-the-box results (without any tuning). However, insofar as there is a lot of work required to maintain each of CatBoostLSS, LightGBMLSS, and XGBoostLSS, it would probably make more sense to focus on one of them and make it a best-in-class library rather than dividing efforts across all three. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear Community,
Given that CatBoost does not support GPU training of custom loss functions, I want to have your opinion on whether or not a CatBoostLSS implementation would still be of interest. Let me know!
1 vote ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions