Skip to content

Gas profile assertions on hot paths #107

Description

@nanaf6203-bit

Problem Statement
Per #79 we have a profile. We don't have assertions — a regression
that increases tip() cost by 50% won't fail CI.

Why it matters
Production-deploy cost regression detection.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A mod gas test that asserts tip() instructions ≤ 50,000,
    withdraw() ≤ 35,000, etc.
  • Tune by bootstrap on a known baseline.

Files/Modules Likely Affected

  • src/test.rs

Difficulty Hard. Estimated Effort M.

Labels
area:performance, area:testing, priority:low


Imported from docs/open-issues-draft.md as draft issue #47 (commit 7becd4b). Original draft-order cross-references in this body have been remapped to current GitHub issue numbers at import time.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

GrantFox OSSIssue tracked in GrantFox OSSMaybe RewardedIssue may be eligible for a GrantFox rewardOfficial Campaign | FWC26Campaign: Official Campaign | FWC26area:performanceImported from open-issues-draft.mdarea:testingImported from open-issues-draft.mdpriority:lowImported from open-issues-draft.md

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions