Git provider
Other
System Info
Environment
- Git provider: Gitea
- PR-Agent deployed as Gitea webhook app
- Model: GPT-5.4
Bug details
Summary
Gitea repo-level settings are confusing / not working as expected. We tried to store PR-Agent review instructions in .pr_agent.toml inside the repository root, but the review output does not follow them.
What we expected
PR-Agent should load repository-specific settings from .pr_agent.toml and apply pr_reviewer.extra_instructions during /review.
What we configured
In PR-Agent config we updated the following properties:
[config]
use_repo_settings_file = true
[gitea]
repo_setting = ".pr_agent.toml"
[pr_help_docs]
repo_default_branch = "master"
And in the repository we added .pr_agent.toml:
[pr_reviewer]
extra_instructions = """
## Feedback style
- Use "Blocking" prefix for issues that must be fixed before merge.
- Use "Suggestion" prefix for improvements that are optional but recommended.
- Keep comments concise — one sentence for the problem, one sentence for the fix or direction.
"""
Actual behavior
PR-Agent reviews are generated, but they do not follow the instructions from .pr_agent.toml.
Expected behavior
The reviewer should pick up the repo-level configuration and reflect the requested style, for example:
- findings prefixed with
Blocking or Suggestion
- concise two-sentence comments
- visible effect of
pr_reviewer.extra_instructions
Question
What is the officially supported way to enable repo-level .pr_agent.toml for Gitea?
Git provider
Other
System Info
Environment
Bug details
Summary
Gitea repo-level settings are confusing / not working as expected. We tried to store PR-Agent review instructions in
.pr_agent.tomlinside the repository root, but the review output does not follow them.What we expected
PR-Agent should load repository-specific settings from
.pr_agent.tomland applypr_reviewer.extra_instructionsduring/review.What we configured
In PR-Agent config we updated the following properties:
And in the repository we added
.pr_agent.toml:Actual behavior
PR-Agent reviews are generated, but they do not follow the instructions from
.pr_agent.toml.Expected behavior
The reviewer should pick up the repo-level configuration and reflect the requested style, for example:
BlockingorSuggestionpr_reviewer.extra_instructionsQuestion
What is the officially supported way to enable repo-level
.pr_agent.tomlfor Gitea?