Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weighted Kernel Density #1445

Closed
AbelVM opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Weighted Kernel Density #1445

AbelVM opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@AbelVM
Copy link
Member

AbelVM commented Jul 30, 2018

Hi!

I've spent the morning porting and shaping the good ol' ESRI's (weighted)Kernel Density functionality into TURFjs.

I have made a new branch, but no PR because I'm not able to properly run the required linter or tests, so it surely needs some extra work. Something must be wrong with my setup, some combination of node, npm, babel, etc versions that had forced me to code almost blindly in terms of testing.

My local linter and tests look OK, but the workflow in the contribution guide is failing for me for the simplest test 😞 , so I haven't digged deeper with more complex tests.

The code lives here:

https://github.com/Turfjs/turf/tree/abelvm/kernelDensity/packages/turf-kernel_density

Any help is welcome! Virtual 🍻 are cooling in the virtual fridge for the one who unblocks it!

It would help me to fix my local setup too, so I can make some other PRs that I have waiting in the queue

@rowanwins
Copy link
Member

Hey @AbelVM

Unfortunately due to #1428 now's not a great time to be contributing new modules. Hopefully once I get #1432 landed thing will become a fair bit simpler again.

So stay tuned :)

@Turfjs Turfjs locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 24, 2024
@smallsaucepan smallsaucepan converted this issue into discussion #2784 Dec 24, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants