owl2soml option -shorten

[VladimirAlexiev]

• In electrical CIM, all props are unique to the domain class, and prop names duplicate the domain
• Furthermore, most object prop names also include the range class (or a plural version of it). We like the practice that a prop name replicates the range
• But replicating the domain is verbose, so we'd like to shorten prop names by removing the domain local name from the prop name
• add option -shorten 1 to do this (see column SOML, where cim: is the default voc_prefix)

domain	prop	range	SOML name
cim:ApparentPower	cim:ApparentPower.value	cim:Float	value
cim:CurrentLimit	entsoe2:CurrentLimit.normalValue	cim:CurrentFlow	entsoe2:normalValue
cim:Equipment	cim:Equipment.EquipmentContainer	cim:EquipmentContainer	equipmentContainer
cim:EquipmentContainer	cim:EquipmentContainer.Equipments	cim:Equipment.EquipmentContainer	equipments

This allows natural and shorter GraphQL querying, eg:

{equipmentContainer(ID:"...") {
  name
  equipments { # shorter and nicer than: EquipmentContainer_Equipments
    id
    name
  }
}}

A bigger example: instead of queries like this:

{
  substation {
    id
    powerSystemResource_Location {
      location_PositionPoints {
        positionPoint_yPosition
        positionPoint_xPosition
      }
    }
    substation_VoltageLevels {
      voltageLevel_BaseVoltage {
        baseVoltage_nominalVoltage
      }
    }
  }

You can use shorter queries like this:

{
  substation {
    id
    location {positionPoints {
        yPosition
        xPosition
      }}
    voltageLevels { baseVoltage { nominalVoltage } }
  }

Mirrored from https://ontotext.atlassian.net/browse/DATA-119

[VladimirAlexiev]

In addition to removing the domain class name (eg DiagramObject below), we should remove all its superclass names (eg IdentifiedObject).
Eg from ENTSO-E_Test_Configurations_v3.0.2\v3.0\MicroGrid\MicroGrid-Type2\MicroGrid-Type2-HVDC-MAS\20210401T1730Z_1D_HVDC_DL_1.xml:

  <cim:DiagramObject rdf:ID="_162a0a97-7da2-a8bd-bdfd-39fc11ca0baf">
    <cim:IdentifiedObject.name>none</cim:IdentifiedObject.name>
    <cim:DiagramObject.rotation>0</cim:DiagramObject.rotation>
    <cim:DiagramObject.IdentifiedObject rdf:resource="#_b6978550-cb6e-11e1-bcee-406c8f32ef58" />
    <cim:DiagramObject.Diagram rdf:resource="#_f27170a0-16d5-292d-d803-39fc11ca0baf" />
    <cim:IdentifiedObject.mRID>162a0a97-7da2-a8bd-bdfd-39fc11ca0baf</cim:IdentifiedObject.mRID>
  </cim:DiagramObject>

How to check whether this won't lead to any conflicts? Eg above are two similar names that I mistakenly took to be a conflict:

• DiagramObject.IdentifiedObject refers to the electrical object being placed on the diagram
• IdentifiedObject.mRID (almost equal to rdf:ID) refers to the diagram object itself