-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Models yet to relax to CC BY 4.0 license #1113
Comments
@durack1 COUNT ID 30 E3SM 2.0 (Energy Exascale Earth System Model) the licence it is under is not listed in the github table but I’ve found via the website that it uses a BSD 3-clause license. Looking through that, it looks to me similar to CC BY 4.0. Should I contact them to request the switch? They’ve gone over to CC BY 4.0 from SA for the other 3 models. BW, Briony |
@CMIP-IPO thanks for the update. The |
@CMIP-IPO any more updates for me? |
@CMIP-IPO we've made a good dent in the 131 models that have published (or plan to publish, imminently) data. Let's keep this open until after 30th September, and close once the new week begins - making sure to finalize the table above to sync with the final state |
@CMIP-IPO it looks like if we could get CAS and AER to engage, we'd almost be completely done - not sure if an extra nag is warranted? |
@MartinaSt ping! This is the remaining relaxation tasks, not many remaining! |
@CMIP-IPO @MartinaSt @matthew-mizielinski we are now down to just 6 models (of 132) that have not relaxed their licenses - I think this is a good job, so will close this issue out. If the others want to change their license, we can do this at any future point, but this will require them to initiate the change rather than WIP/IPO chasing them down |
thanks @durack1! |
@CMIP-IPO nice work, 100% success - and closed out |
@matthew-mizielinski I took a quick review this AM regarding models that are yet to get in contact regarding relaxing licenses to CC BY 4.0 - the list is larger than I assumed (40 currently). We have the non-published contributions under control in #1028, however, figured generating yet another table to capture the remaining models is useful.
It would be great if you could assist with reaching out to these groups and clarifying their license status. As per #1028 it'd be great to use the table below dynamically so we can keep up to date with the evolving status
Updated 221012 - last merged PR #1175
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: