You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I had a nasty runtime error just now in a strong-named project targeting .NET Framework 4.8 that uses this NuGet package, as strong-named assemblies transitively require all referenced assemblies to also have strong-names.
I can work-around it with the StrongNamer hack package, but I'd prefer it if this assembly were strong-named properly in the first place.
You should strong name your open-source .NET libraries. Strong naming an assembly ensures the most people can use it, and strict assembly loading only affects .NET Framework.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I had a nasty runtime error just now in a strong-named project targeting .NET Framework 4.8 that uses this NuGet package, as strong-named assemblies transitively require all referenced assemblies to also have strong-names.
I can work-around it with the
StrongNamer
hack package, but I'd prefer it if this assembly were strong-named properly in the first place.Microsoft explicitly recommend that libraries distributed as NuGet packages should be strong-named:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: