Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GraphSage在无监督情况下use_id的emb拼接作为feature效果会好吗? #293

Open
lixusign opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@lixusign
Copy link

lixusign commented Jul 29, 2020

请问NN类归纳学习,拼接id的emb的物理意义是啥?

直接学习feature的归纳表达 作为节点的emb 和 学习feature + emb(id) 的归纳表达,作为节点的emb .

区别是啥,后者会效果好些吗?

另外对于后者这种,破坏了归纳学习的特点,变成了直推学习

@lixusign
Copy link
Author

请问 而且为啥sage上提供 unsupervised , 而 xxgcn 不再提供了unsupervised。 原因是原理上 纯归纳学习不混合emb在非监督学习上效果烂?

@lixusign
Copy link
Author

比较困惑作者 提供算法的时候是咋考虑的,肯定有自己的考量

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant