You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unit tests are not only helpful to promote code quality, they are also useful documentation for packages, and are generally up to date with any API changes.
As such, would it make sense to include unit tests by default in any new package created with newt pkg new (assuming the default PACKAGE_TYPE_LIB package type)?
This inclusion may push people to create more unit tests, and if they aren't desired it's simply a matter of deleting the appropriate sub-directory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unit tests are not only helpful to promote code quality, they are also useful documentation for packages, and are generally up to date with any API changes.
As such, would it make sense to include unit tests by default in any new package created with
newt pkg new
(assuming the defaultPACKAGE_TYPE_LIB
package type)?This inclusion may push people to create more unit tests, and if they aren't desired it's simply a matter of deleting the appropriate sub-directory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: