-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add reference field when Minting/Burning tokens #841
Comments
I've been thinking about "proposal metadata" for a while since we've had to kind of hack our way around this for AGPs. One solution I've thought of is that for any action that becomes a vote (or for any vote created directly in the Voting app) users are put into a flow to fill out metadata about the proposal before submitting the transaction to create the vote. The flow would be like: Action -> You can't do that directly, but you can create a vote -> Fill out metadata -> create vote Then the user would have the option to fill out a few fields of metadata like:
The metadata itself doesn't need to be stored on-chain but could be put in a text file that is stored on IPFS and only the IPFS hash of the text file is stored in the vote transaction on chain. |
@john-light A flow of this sort would be possible with #452, along with a bit of structured information from apps that describe what their forwarding inputs are. |
Closing; we will evaluate this for new contract changes. |
Note: this has been closed to be tracked in the "wishlist for future upgrades".
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The token manager is commonly being used to manage group membership, so the action to mint a token or burn a token is equivalent to membership proposal. These proposals typically require approval via a voting app, but there is very little context provided to voters when evaluating a decision other that the tokens and address.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be useful for users to provide a reference (like the finance app has) that would allow users to provide information to the voting app about the purpose/intention of the proposal and to include a link to an external source for discussion (like a github or forum post).
Describe alternatives you've considered
I know there is plans to add discussions to apps like voting which would be also very useful and perhaps a better long term solution. However, such a solution would be complementary to the reference approach, and so I don't see it as an either or type of decision.
Additional context
This functionality is a requirement for an upcoming dao launch, so there is some urgency to this request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: