You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have used the script that was made available under the path amazon-redshift-utils/src/AnalyzeVacuumUtility/lib/analyze_vacuum.py
As per my understanding we are mainly depending on interleaved_skew value from svv_interleaved_columns which is the ratio of skew present in interleaved sort columns(> 1.4)
I have run the script once and some 30 tables in the schema have gone through vacuumReIndex consuming 3 hours of time and that was good as it was for the first time I have run the vacuum ReIndex, But it was very unobvious and unfortunate that even when I ran the script for 2nd time with no new inserts or updates on the tables the script again picked the sametables and ran the vacuum ReIndex for 3 more hours..
I have gone through the log and found that the interleaved_skew value didn't go down after 1st vacuum ReIndex and so as the interleaved_skew is > 1.4 they are being picked again and vacuum ReIndex ran against them.
Is this an expected behavior or are we fooling ourselves by using interleaved_skew as the value of consideration?
Do we have any other stat that we could rely on to decide if a table should go through vacuum ReIndex other than interleaved_skew?
And I have tried to know about svv_interleaved_counts and found probably nothing..
It would help if there is little explanation on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have used the script that was made available under the path
amazon-redshift-utils/src/AnalyzeVacuumUtility/lib/analyze_vacuum.py
As per my understanding we are mainly depending on interleaved_skew value from svv_interleaved_columns which is the ratio of skew present in interleaved sort columns(> 1.4)
I have run the script once and some 30 tables in the schema have gone through vacuum ReIndex consuming 3 hours of time and that was good as it was for the first time I have run the vacuum ReIndex, But it was very unobvious and unfortunate that even when I ran the script for 2nd time with no new inserts or updates on the tables the script again picked the same tables and ran the vacuum ReIndex for 3 more hours..
I have gone through the log and found that the interleaved_skew value didn't go down after 1st vacuum ReIndex and so as the interleaved_skew is > 1.4 they are being picked again and vacuum ReIndex ran against them.
Is this an expected behavior or are we fooling ourselves by using interleaved_skew as the value of consideration?
Do we have any other stat that we could rely on to decide if a table should go through vacuum ReIndex other than interleaved_skew?
And I have tried to know about svv_interleaved_counts and found probably nothing..
It would help if there is little explanation on it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: