Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a data analyst, I want clear information on APIs, so I can see what is available to me #112

Open
4 tasks
mwigham opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mwigham
Copy link
Contributor

mwigham commented Mar 1, 2024

Feedback René: Expects SPARQL/Linked Data to be on the highest level (couldn't find it, as it is a subheading on the B&G Media Catalog APIs page), also expects APIs to be organised according to technical protocol, not according to the content of the datasets. The GTAA page links through to a result page, would expect a query endpoint.

(general comment: APIs are only interesting once you want to get information about a dataset)

Tasks:

  • Review the API information, consider how we can reorganise them to make it easier to find what you need. Should the APIs page be pure technical with links to datasets that can be accessed via the API (and then link to the API page from the content datasets)?
  • Review the link from the GTAA page, can this be to an endpoint? Or is that not feasible/desirable?
  • Test with René, and other users if we can find them

Acceptance criteria:

  • A technical user can find the information they need about APIs
@rozelemarijn
Copy link

heel relevant - hopelijk kunnen we dit binnenkort bespreken. zou officieel buiten scope zijn muv MOZ, maar zie niet wanneer we hier anders aan toe komen en vind het wel belangrijk.

@KleinRana
Copy link
Contributor

Depends on policy around (search) API's/ API use
Depends on if we can use schatkamer OAIPMH
list of API's

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants