Background
schema/parascriptural/word_alignment.schema.json was removed from the develop branch. The parascriptural word alignment flavor has been superseded by the alignment flavor type, which is now the standard way to represent word-level alignment between texts.
This removal was made without a tracked issue documenting the decision.
What was removed
schema/parascriptural/word_alignment.schema.json
- Associated documentation (
docs/flavors/parascriptural_word_alignment_flavor.rst)
- The
parascriptural flavor type name from relationship.schema.json
Rationale
The alignment flavor (type.flavorType.name: "alignment") covers this use case. Having two separate mechanisms for word alignment creates confusion.
Open questions
- Are there any existing burritos using the parascriptural word alignment flavor that need a migration path?
- Should the
relationship.schema.json explicitly note that alignment is the successor?
Background
schema/parascriptural/word_alignment.schema.jsonwas removed from thedevelopbranch. The parascriptural word alignment flavor has been superseded by thealignmentflavor type, which is now the standard way to represent word-level alignment between texts.This removal was made without a tracked issue documenting the decision.
What was removed
schema/parascriptural/word_alignment.schema.jsondocs/flavors/parascriptural_word_alignment_flavor.rst)parascripturalflavor type name fromrelationship.schema.jsonRationale
The alignment flavor (
type.flavorType.name: "alignment") covers this use case. Having two separate mechanisms for word alignment creates confusion.Open questions
relationship.schema.jsonexplicitly note thatalignmentis the successor?