Documentation improvements for setup clarity & consistency

[schwentker]

I noticed several documentation areas that might improve the setup experience, though I could be missing context:

Formatting issues:

• .env configuration section may benefit from better code blocks & formatting
• Mixed path examples (Unix/macOS focus, inconsistent Windows support)

Missing steps:

• No explicit dependency installation step after uv lock
• Maybe should mention uv sync to install dependencies

Content organization:

• Tools like box_read_tool, box_list_folder_content_by_folder_id, and box_manage_folder_tool appear in multiple sections with slight variations
• Could benefit from clearer authentication requirements section (which Box API scopes are needed, personal vs enterprise account compatibility)

Happy to submit a PR addressing these formatting & organization issues if helpful.

[mngrant]

Agreed.

If docs walkthrough Cursor and uv then we should see those in Requirements.

I'd prefer a more vanilla approach that requires fewer third party installs/services

[shurrey]

Thanks for the recommendations. We are in the process of adding new functionality, so we can add these to the list, or if you want to do a PR @schwentker , we'd be happy to review.

For things like Cursor, we are just showing some of the MCP clients and how to set up the MCP server in them, so not a requirement. Sounds like we could make that section a little clearer.

[ruhipathan0307-stack]

Details