-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Description
I have been unable to figure out a way to produce a writer that allows the production of a writer for fields that do not have a getter.
The use case here is that I have an interface
interface ITtype {
Optional<String> getId();
}
and a model with that has a class that implements ITtype (assume there's an <interface> node in the model, please)
<field java.getter = "false">
<name>id</name>
<version>1.0.0+</version>
<required>true</required>
<description>An id</description>
<type>String</type>
</field>
and a <codeSegment> that says (approximately)
<code>
java.util.Optional<String> getId() { return java.util.Optional.ofNullable(this.id);}
</code>
However, the Xpp3 writer distinctly uses the getter for getId()in the writeX( code, even though that getter doesn't exist.
It seems reasonable to make the the generator for the writer produce a reflection-based get rather than trying to use a getter that is obviously not going to exist, given the the Maven/Codehaus team's comfort with using reflection to acquire the values of locally classed private fields, especially in generated code.