You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For complex or recurring rules it makes sense to put the implementation in a seperate function. However, a function call on its own is nat a valid validation-expression:
validate::validator( f(x) ) fails with 'invalid syntax'.
As a workaround validate::validator( f(x) == TRUE ) does work.
Tested with version 1.1.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For complex or recurring rules it makes sense to put the implementation in a seperate function. However, a function call on its own is nat a valid validation-expression:
validate::validator( f(x) ) fails with 'invalid syntax'.
As a workaround validate::validator( f(x) == TRUE ) does work.
Tested with version 1.1.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: