We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a follow-up to
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]#post-dvvrnjipkxixrylkxcki:40forum.dlang.org
I wonder if I have missed something in my usgae of Pegged?
Doesn't Pegged currently waste lots of allocations on chains of single-child node allocations?
Wouldn't it be better to lookup (without involving an AST instance) that, in my case, C.Identifier is an instance of C.DirectDeclarator?
C.Identifier
C.DirectDeclarator
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I answered directly in the D forum thread.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
As a follow-up to
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]#post-dvvrnjipkxixrylkxcki:40forum.dlang.org
I wonder if I have missed something in my usgae of Pegged?
Doesn't Pegged currently waste lots of allocations on chains of single-child node allocations?
Wouldn't it be better to lookup (without involving an AST instance) that, in my case,
C.Identifier
is an instance ofC.DirectDeclarator
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: