How to efficiently implement dynamic multi-tenant API rate limiting in ASP.NET Core Web API?

[emr-nandan]

Hello everyone,

I’m working on a multi-tenant ASP.NET Core Web API where different tenants require customized API rate limiting policies. Some tenants share rate limits (shared quota), while others have isolated limits. Additionally, these quotas need to be dynamically adjustable at runtime without restarting the service.

My main challenges are:

• Efficiently enforcing rate limits per tenant with minimal performance overhead.
• Supporting both shared and isolated quota strategies.
• Dynamically updating rate limits without downtime.
• Avoiding global locks or bottlenecks that can degrade scalability.
• Ensuring thread safety in a highly concurrent environment.

What are the best practices or existing libraries/middleware patterns for implementing this?
Are there any recommended caching or distributed coordination approaches (e.g., Redis, token buckets, sliding windows) that work well in ASP.NET Core?
How can I architect this to scale horizontally and support cloud deployments?

Any example patterns, code samples, or references would be highly appreciated.

[NandanDevHub]

so for implementing dynamic multi-tenant API rate limiting in ASP.NET Core Web API is definitely a complex but solvable challenge. Below are some best practices and architectural patterns to consider:

1. Use Middleware or Filters for Rate Limiting

Implement rate limiting as middleware or action filters that intercept incoming requests and apply tenant-specific policies.

2. Tenant Identification

Identify the tenant from each request (e.g., API key, JWT claim, or custom header) early in the pipeline to apply the correct rate limit.

3. Rate Limit Strategies

• Token Bucket or Leaky Bucket algorithms: These are common for smooth rate limiting.
• Sliding Window counters: More precise but slightly more resource-intensive.

4. Caching and Storage

• Use a fast, distributed cache like Redis to store counters and quota state. This helps with scalability and supports multiple instances.
• Each tenant’s counters can be stored separately, and shared quotas can be implemented by pointing multiple tenants to the same Redis key.

5. Dynamic Configuration

• Store rate limit configurations in a database or centralized config store.
• Use a background service or configuration refresh mechanism to update policies in-memory at runtime without restarting.
• Alternatively, use IOptionsMonitor in ASP.NET Core to detect config changes dynamically.

6. Avoid Bottlenecks

• Minimize locking by using atomic Redis operations (e.g., INCR with expiry).
• Avoid global locks; keep per-tenant state isolated to prevent contention.

7. Scalability and High Availability

• Use Redis clusters or managed cache services for distributed rate limit state.
• Ensure middleware is stateless and can run on multiple servers behind a load balancer.

8. Libraries and Tools

• Consider existing libraries like AspNetCoreRateLimit, but customize for multi-tenancy and dynamic updates.
• Explore Polly for advanced resilience and throttling policies.

Example workflow below

1. Extract tenant ID from request.
2. Fetch or cache the tenant’s rate limit config.
3. Use Redis atomic commands to increment and check usage.
4. Deny or throttle if quota exceeded.
5. Update config dynamically from DB or config store.

---

This architecture balances performance, scalability, and flexibility for multi-tenant environments.