You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Total Execution Time: Approximately 252.40 seconds
This shows an improvement of about 115.96 seconds (roughly 31.5%) when using the --local_only option.
Inquiry
Could you please confirm if this level of performance improvement is within the expected range? Additionally, any suggestions for further optimizations or adjustments to my test setup would be greatly appreciated.
Additionally, I would like to ask whether the requirement to explicitly specify all size parameters (i.e., size_x, size_y, and size_z) when using the --autobox option is intended behavior, or if there are plans to simplify this in the future.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have conducted a test using the files provided in the Unidock GitHub test directory. The details are as follows:
Receptor File: 1a30_protein.pdbqt
Ligand File: 1a30_ligand.sdf
→ The path for this ligand file is repeated 10,000 times in the test_sdfs.txt file.
Test Environment
Test Details and Execution Commands
Two modes were tested. In both cases, the box size is fixed at 22.50 × 22.50 × 22.50 and the center coordinates are (8.73, 25.62, 4.68).
unidock --receptor 1a30_protein.pdbqt --ligand_index test_sdfs.txt --center_x 8.73 --center_y 25.62 --center_z 4.68 --size_x 22.50 --size_y 22.50 --size_z 22.50 --seed 1 --num_modes 1 --search_mode fast --verbosity 0 --dir /tmp/result_normal/sdfs
unidock --receptor 1a30_protein.pdbqt --ligand_index test_sdfs.txt --center_x 8.73 --center_y 25.62 --center_z 4.68 --size_x 22.50 --size_y 22.50 --size_z 22.50 --seed 1 --num_modes 1 --search_mode fast --verbosity 0 --dir /tmp/result_local/sdfs --autobox --local_only
This shows an improvement of about 115.96 seconds (roughly 31.5%) when using the --local_only option.
Inquiry
Could you please confirm if this level of performance improvement is within the expected range? Additionally, any suggestions for further optimizations or adjustments to my test setup would be greatly appreciated.
Additionally, I would like to ask whether the requirement to explicitly specify all size parameters (i.e., size_x, size_y, and size_z) when using the --autobox option is intended behavior, or if there are plans to simplify this in the future.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: